Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 195 (0.61 seconds)

State vs Accused on 3 April, 2012

Babu, Alternate Nodal Officer, Vodafone Essar Mobile Service Ltd. as PW30 and Vinu T. Abrahim, Scientific Asst., CFSL, CBI as PW31. 4. After closing ... mobile phones which were mentioned in the request letter for the period 20.3.2007 to 25.3.2007. He prepared call detail report of five mobile numbers
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cbi vs Sunil Kumar on 29 September, 2012

memo Ex.PW5/D and during his personal search a Nokia mobile phone having IMEI no. 355353001663818 was recovered. The accused was dismissed from ... complainant, collected call details of mobile phones of both the accused and the complainant and collected the CFSL reports on chemical washes and voice analysis
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State (Cbi) vs Shammi Kapoor on 7 September, 2012

supplied the information in regard to mobile no.9818115524 in the name of Surinder Wadhwa and mobile no.98109560022 of Jagdish Chauhan ... complainant and accused persons from the mobile service providers and obtaining the chemical examination report from CFSL besides filing the charge sheet
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Parveen on 4 August, 2012

However, he admitted that he had neither got the said mobile sent to any CFSL Lab nor he had himself checked to find out whether ... Besides this, the mobile phone of the accused which was seized by the I.O, had never been sent for CFSL examination
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next