Sudipta Lenka vs State Of Odisha & Ors on 12 March, 2014
been drawn to
the report of the CFSL, Hyderabad to which place the seized mobile of the
deceased alongwith the Sim card(s) were sent
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 160 (0.89 seconds)Wasim Akram Malik vs National Investigating Agency on 5 August, 2014
which are yet to come. Some items (mobile
phone, retrieved e-mails etc.) have been forwarded to CFSL for
forensic analysis and their examination reports ... analyzed. Some items such as mobile phones and retrieved e-mails were
sent to the CFSL for forensic analysis. The application brings out that
Parminder Kaur vs State on 1 August, 2014
deceased. Apart from producing the CFSL report dated 29.08.2008
with regard to the downloaded data from the mobile phones alleged to
have been seized from ... moved before a learned Metropolitan Magistrate
for sending the three mobile phones to the CFSL for examination. The
application was allowed by order dated
Sudipta Lenka vs The State Of Odisha on 12 March, 2014
been drawn to
the report of the CFSL, Hyderabad to which place the seized mobile of the
deceased alongwith the Sim card(s) were sent
Syed Tanzeem Ahmed @ Tanzeem vs State Of Karnataka on 2 September, 2014
crime.
8. After the arrest of accused No.25-appellant
herein, his mobile phones were recovered based on his
voluntary statement and he was found ... different persons' names.
SIM cards and mobile phone were subjected to analysis by
the concerned laboratory (CFSL, Hyderabad). It is
reported that photographs
Baaj Singh & Anr vs State on 28 May, 2014
submitted that call detail records including results of CFSL
and FSL analysis of mobile phones of petitioners makes it clear that mobile
phone number
Sc No.14/09 State vs . Stanley Chibuike & Ors. on 29 March, 2014
Nodal Officer from Vodafone Essar Mobile Service
Ltd. has produced before the court, the call detail records of the mobile
number ... Pascal and the lady Ritu and the intercepted
mobile conversations were sent to CFSL for comparison and PW27 Dr.
C.P. Singh, Assistant Director
Cbi vs Subhash Chand on 22 November, 2014
marked Q2 Ex.P2. The memory card of the mobile phone of the
complainant was taken out and same was sealed and marked ... CFSL. PW4
Sh. Deepak Kumar Tanwar examined voices in the CFSL. PW2 Sh.
Vinod Kumar and PW3 Sh. Israr Babu proved the documents regarding
mobile
State vs . Abdul Latif And Ors. on 24 May, 2014
able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the voices in the intercepted
mobile conversations belongs to the accused persons only. As per record,
during ... voice sample of accused Mohd. Akhtar and the
intercepted mobile conversations were sent to CFSL for comparison and
PW18 Deepak Kumar Tanwar, Senior Scientific Officer
State vs . 1. Akeel Ahmed, S/O Mohd. Umar on 30 April, 2014
exhibits in the matter were sent
to CFSL, Haiderabad. On 14.10.2003, print out of mobile
phone no.36984880 was taken out, vide which