good price.
8. As against this, it is contended by Mr. Chidambaram, learned counsel for the appellants, that :
(i) the board of directors (15 directors ... company, that plea should be rejected.
14. However, learned counsel Mr. Chidambaram vehemently submitted that the law laid down by the Privy Council
Chidambaram, General Secretary, ... vs Joint Civil Judge (J.D.), Narol, ... on 20 September, 1984
Equivalent citations: AIR1986GUJ17, (1985)1GLR353, AIR 1986 GUJARAT 17
JUDGMENT
Respondent(s)
=============================================
Appearance:
Special Civil Application No.5159/2010
MR P CHIDAMBARAM, SR. ADVOCATE with MR VIKRAM NANKANI, SR.
ADVOCATE for MR NARESH THACKER with ... Special Civil Application No.9871/2008
MR P CHIDAMBARAM, SR. ADVOCATE with MR VIKRAM NANKANI, SR.
ADVOCATE for MR NARESH THACKER with MR CUDAPPA NANDGOPAL
will be presently seen, it has no substance. Learned Counsel Shri P. Chidambaram appearing for the petitioner alternatively had gone on an assumption that Section ... aforesaid background, the learned Counsel Shri P. Chidambaram had referred to Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India. A person cannot be tried
Raval is neither bonafide nor genuine.
12. Learned Senior Counsel Mr. P.Chidambaram for Nanavaty Associates, on behalf of respondent ... shall continue till further orders."
12.1. Learned Senior Counsel Mr. P.Chidambaram has submitted that the operative part having effect on the controversy before
necessary to refer to the background note submitted by Mr. P. Chidambaram, learned counsel for the petitioners from which the following are the relevant extracts ... learned counsel for the respondent-company--Essar Steel Ltd. and Mr. P. Chidambaram, learned counsel for the petitioners have been heard at length on three
Devid Raja Joyel @ Chidambaram vs State Of ... on 4 September, 2014
Bench: Ks Jhaveri , A.G.Uraizee
R/CR.A/82/2002 JUDGMENT ... circulated to the civil
judge ?
=========================================================
DEVID RAJA JOYEL @ CHIDAMBARAM....Appellant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT....Opponent(s)/Respondent(s)
=========================================================
Appearance:
MR EKANT G AHUJA, ADVOCATE
Devid Raja Joyel @ Chidambaram vs State Of Gujarat - Opponent(S) on 22 January, 2009
Author: Bhagwati Prasad
Bench: Bhagwati Prasad
CR.A/8220/2002 ... With
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 86 of 2002
=========================================================
DEVID RAJA JOYEL @ CHIDAMBARAM - Appellant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - Opponent(s)
=========================================================
Appearance :
THROUGH JAIL for Appellant
Devid Raja Joyel @ Chidambaram vs State Of Gujarat on 22 November, 2002
Author: D.K.Trivedi
Bench: D.K.Trivedi , J.R.Vora ... GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL No 82 of 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------
DEVID RAJA JOYEL @ CHIDAMBARAM
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
1. Criminal Appeal
individual partner under s. 10(1) .
25. In CIT v. R. M. Chidambaram Pillai (1977) 106 ITR 292 (SC), the two assessees, along with others ... Full Bench of the Madras High Court (in R. M. Chidambaram Pillai v. CIT (1970) 77 ITR 494), which heard the reference, upset the case