view of the subsequent decision of the Supreme Court in Chidambaram Chettiar v. Santhanara Swami Odayar, and that in two unreported decisions of this court ... Periannan 's case (FB) and that of the Supreme Court in Chidambaram's case regarding the concept of domain or home farm land
Velivela and
Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu
^Counsel for Respondent :Sri K.Chidambaram
<Gist:
>Head Note:
? CASES REFERRED ... Kambhampati Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the appellants/defendants,
and Sri K.Chidambaram, learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff.
Sri Srinivasa Rao Velivela, learned counsel
ground that he is the illegitimate son of late Kuncham Chidambaram, the paternal grandfather of the first defendant, in the Court of the District Judge ... ground that he is the illegitimate son of their paternal grand-father Chidambaram. On the advice of some respectful persons interested in the welfare
admission the learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent No. 11 Mr. P. Chidambaram raised a preliminary objection that the writ petition is not maintainable ... arguments made by learned Counsel for the respondents led by Mr. P. Chidambaram, Senior Advocate who appeared for respondent No. 11 because the Counsels
corrected Under Section 152 or 153 C.P.C.
6. Sri P. Chidambaram, learned Counsel for the revision petitioner has taken me through the relevant ... sought to be amended. For proper appreciation of the contentions of Sri Chidambaram, it is useful to extract Para No. 29 thereof:
"29. This
your request for special REP certificate cannot be considered.
8. Mr. P. Chidambaram, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, contends that ... that the challenge to the impugned order is untenable.
14. Mr. F. Chidambaram, the earned Counsel submits that the legal undertaking was obtained for ensuring
request for special REP certificate cannot be considered."
8. Mr. P. Chidambaram, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, contends that ... that the challenge to the impugned order is untenable.
14. Mr. P. Chidambaram, the learned counsel submits that the legal undertaking was obtained for ensuring
request for special REP certificate cannot be considered,"
8. Mr. P. Chidambaram, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, contends that ... that the challenge to the impugned orders is untenable.
14. Mr. P. Chidambaram, the learned counsel submits that the legal undertaking was obtained for ensuring
Calicut Municipal Council v. Kunhipathumma , AIR 1933 Mad 454, Chidambaram Chettiar v. Narayanaswami Iyer 1928 Mad WN 240 ; and Gopalakrishnayya v. Lashmanarao ... Calicut Municipal Council v. Kunhinathumma , AIR 1933 Mad 454 and Chidambaram Chettiar v. Narayanswamy Iyer 1928 Mad WN 240 which followed Veerapppa Chetty v. Tindal
Madras High Court, Kerala High Court, and this Court have been in Chidambaram Chettiar v. Shanmugham Pillai , AIR 1938 Mad. 129, K. Surendran ... parties Were litigating their respective liability in civil Court, relying on Chidambaram Chettiar 's case ( supra), V.V.L.N. Chary
