R.Vaigai Kannan vs The District Collector on 17 October, 2014
2014
151 Cr.P.C . r/w 7 (I)(A) CLA. Act.
2.
Bodi Town
445/2014 ... CLA. Act.
3.
Kombai
176/2014
151 Cr.P.C . r/w 7 (I)(A) CLA. Act.
4.
Thevaram
180/2014
Search Results Page
Did you search for
CLA act
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.69 seconds)Registrar Of Companies vs Reebok India Co on 4 April, 2014
following
the procedure prescribed under Section 234 (7) of Companies Act, the
complainant complied with legal requirement, and as such complainant could
not be dismissed ... CLA 21 (Delhi), wherein it
has been observed that no prior approval of Central Government is required
under Section 234 of the Companies Act
Registrar Of Companies vs Sh. Subhinder Singh Prem on 4 April, 2014
following
the procedure prescribed under Section 234 (7) of Companies Act, the
complainant complied with legal requirement, and as such complainant could
not be dismissed ... CLA 21 (Delhi), wherein it
8
has been observed that no prior approval of Central Government is required
under Section 234 of the Companies Act
Registrar Of Companies vs Sh. Subhinder Singh Prem on 4 April, 2014
following
the procedure prescribed under Section 234 (7) of Companies Act, the
complainant complied with legal requirement, and as such complainant could
not be dismissed ... CLA 21 (Delhi), wherein it
8
has been observed that no prior approval of Central Government is required
under Section 234 of the Companies Act
Registrar Of Companies vs Sh. Subhinder Singh Prem on 4 April, 2014
following
the procedure prescribed under Section 234 (7) of Companies Act, the
complainant complied with legal requirement, and as such complainant could
not be dismissed ... CLA 21 (Delhi), wherein it
8
has been observed that no prior approval of Central Government is required
under Section 234 of the Companies Act
Registrar Of Companies vs Sh. Subhinder Singh Prem on 4 April, 2014
following
the procedure prescribed under Section 234 (7) of Companies Act, the
complainant complied with legal requirement, and as such complainant could
not be dismissed ... CLA 21 (Delhi), wherein it
8
has been observed that no prior approval of Central Government is required
under Section 234 of the Companies Act
Registrar Of Companies vs Sh. Subhinder Singh Prem on 4 April, 2014
following
the procedure prescribed under Section 234 (7) of Companies Act, the
complainant complied with legal requirement, and as such complainant could
not be dismissed ... CLA 21 (Delhi), wherein it
8
has been observed that no prior approval of Central Government is required
under Section 234 of the Companies Act
Registrar Of Companies vs Reebok India Co on 4 April, 2014
following
the procedure prescribed under Section 234 (7) of Companies Act, the
complainant complied with legal requirement, and as such complainant could
not be dismissed ... CLA 21 (Delhi), wherein it
has been observed that no prior approval of Central Government is required
under Section 234 of the Companies Act
1