sent for testing to the Central Leather Research Institute (in short "CLRI").
5.3. Consequent thereto, on 07.10.2016, CLRI submitted its report, which ... appears that respondent No.3 was not satisfied with the report of CLRI, as it had received intelligence inputs which propelled him to doubt
Gnana Bharathi vs Clri,Chennai on 3 October, 2016
Central Information Commission:
Users
Login
Central Information Commission
User ID
Please enter User id
Password
Please
Selvam vs Clri,Chennai on 3 October, 2016
Central Information Commission:
Users
Login
Central Information Commission
User ID
Please enter User id
Password
Please enter
declared as finished leather. Four representative samples were drawn and sent to CLRI for test to verify whether the goods were finished leather or otherwise ... CLRI confirmed that the leather is finished in respect of three samples. However, in respect of the fourth sample, CLRI certified that it does
After examination, the representative samples were forwarded to Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI) Chennai. The said Institute certified that the samples were not that ... order in violation of principles of natural justice by not providing CLRI report dated 3/5/2013 to the appellant. He submits that even though
2016 Page 1 of 3
to Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI) within time.
3. It is also the stand of the respondents in the impugned
samples were drawn and sent to Central Leather Research Institute for test. CLRI vide their report certified that the samples did not satisfy test ... observed from the grounds of appeal that appellants are not contesting CLRIs report but are praying for one more opportunity to reprocess the goods
Cell, Govt of India
IIT, Madras, Beside Adyar Cancer Institute, Opp to CLRI
Sardar Patel Road, Adyar Chennai Tamil Nadu
600036
2. Mr. M.Rajakumar
serious objection by the learned counsel that the report of CLRI (copy of which is appearing in page 25 of the appeal folder ... authority is directed to issue summons to the designated authority of the CLRI who had issued the report dated 26.11.2013 and examine his records