samples of the leather are required to be sent to the
CLRI as per the requirement of DGFT Public Notice dated
27.5.1992. We find that ... 2004 came to be introduced.
5.2 While casting aspersions in the CLRI report, ld. counsel has
in the same breadth placed reliance on the said
expert has held as under :
"...The report of the CLRI cannot be taken as a conclusive piece of evidence when the same is challenged ... note that in regard to the certificate or opinion given by the CLRI in the instant case, no conclusiveness is attached to the same
brought two contra reports, one issued by the Central Leather Research Institute [CLRI] and the other by M/s. S.G.S. India Ltd., both ... reliance placed by the learned Counsel on the test reports of CLRI and M/s. S.G.S. India Ltd. Apart from the fact that
they relied on test certificates issued by (1) Central Leather Research Institute [CLRI], (2) the Department of Chemical Technology, University of Bombay ... resin. He has also relied on the test certificates of CLRI, University of Bombay and University of Manchester, which also stated that the product
Others [1986 (25) E.L.T. 670], held that 'The CLRI opined that the samples do not satisfy the norms and conditions of finished ... norms were being followed by the Traders... Since the CLRI was definitely of the view that the subject consignment were not finished leather goods within
Notification in question. He also refers to the technical opinion of the CLRI dt. 19.12.1995 at 52 of the paper book which are certified that
expert. But in the .present case
notwithstanding the fact that the CLRI did not respond to the summons
of the Collector of Customs
samples were drawn and sent to Central Leather Research Institute for test. CLRI vide their report certified that the samples did not satisfy test ... observed from the grounds of appeal that appellants are not contesting CLRIs report but are praying for one more opportunity to reprocess the goods
applicable on the facts of the present case. Further, we find that CLRI vide letter dated 27.7.2004 opined that viewing box for assessing visible damage
