section (2) of the Consumer Protection Act,
1986 (for short CPA) on their being
the members of the opposite party, a society registered under ... which the appeal was allowed;
(i) that a Forum under the CPA has no
jurisdiction over the subject matter of the complaints in view
himself - is that, Section 20 of CPC and Section 11 (1) of CPA 1996 read the same, except that in the case of Consumer Protection ... protected / covered by Section 11 (2) (C) of CPA which has a common reading with Section 20 (C) of CPC. Hence if the Civil Court
Appellant deserves to be examined under the provisions of the Act (CPA, 1986) dehors the Air Act or the above-noted conventions/protocol. However, before ... afore-noted Conventions.
27. It needs little emphasis that the Act (CPA, 1986) was envisaged as a special social legislation to protect consumer rights unlike
Section 14
of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short
CPA). It reads as under:
14. finding
of the District forum - (1) If, after ... been passed by the State Commission under Section 14(1)
(d) of CPA. Question arises if the
State Commission could award
damages more than what
Jurisdiction
(a) Is the appellant's case covered under the CPA, 1986?
47. The first question that the Court has to consider is whether ... appellant's case
is covered under the CPA, 1986. The respondents contend that the appellant
cannot claim to be a consumer, and the medical
expression "branch office" in Section 17(2) of the CPA 1986 [similar to Section 11(2) ] refers to the branch office where ... complainant regarding the applicability of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (CPA 2019) to the present case lacks legal merit. The proceedings in question had already
consumers within the definition of either U/s 2(1)(d) of CPA 1986 or U/s. 2(7) of CPA 2019. It was submitted ... said consumers within the definition of Sec.2(1)(d) of CPA 1986 or Sec.2(7) of CPA 2019. No doubt
inter-alia observed and held as under:
"..... Section 3 of the CPA provides that the provisions of the Act shall be in addition ... corners of law on the subject. Section 14 (1) (d) of the CPA has to be read with CA Act . When there is law defining
submitted that, the said Consumer Complaint CC/2009/102 was filed under CPA 1986, before State Commission, Lucknow and prayed the following relief ... nation.
e) Rs.25000/- as litigation expenses.
The pecuniary jurisdiction as per CPA 1986, to file the complaint before the National Commission, if the claim
terms of provisions of Section 2(1)(d)(i)
of the CPA. The complainant in our opinion does not qualify to be a consumer ... view of the provisions of Section 2(1)(d)(i) of the CPA.
In the complaint it was
contended that the complainant is a consumer
