Regulation 10 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short the CPA 1986) exparte proceeding were taken up against it, vide order dated ... said contention is accepted, it will run contrary to the spirit of CPA 1986, which provides speedy inexpensive and hassle free redressal of the grievances
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (CDRF) (as
District Consumer Commission was called under CPA,
1986), has no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint against
the bank ... remedies under CPA, 1986 are barred by the
provisions of the SARFEASI Act, 2002. In the said judgment ,
Hon'ble Kerala High Court
underlined part above, to the Complainant as
Section 39 of the CPA 2019 does not empower this Commission to
grant such relief. The Complainant ... defined in section 2 (11) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019
(hereinafter CPA, 2019). According to the Complainant, "charging
inflated amount
insurance was
provided for OD Claim, Third Party and Comprehensive Personal Accident
(CPA) cover for owner-driver. On 04.11.2023, when the Complainant and
her husband ... that the OPs be directed to pay Rs.15,00,000/- being CPA cover
provided for Owner & Driver as the husband of the Complainant
consumer complaint was filed before the District Commission under the provisions of CPA, 1986.
Opposite parties in their joint written reply took objection that since ... because as per Section 11 of the CPA, 1986, under which the consumer complaint had been filed, the pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Commission
Prasannakumar)
Orders on maintainability of the complaint filed
U/s.47 of CPA 2019
BY Mr. K.B.SANGANNANAVAR : JUDICIAL MEMBER
1. The complaint filed ... CPA 2019 through advocate on
23.03.2021. Initially OP.1 alone impleaded as opponent and
pursuant to application filed U/o I Rule
period from 22.03.2024 to 21.03.2025. The policy carried a Compulsory
Personal Accident (CPA) cover of Rs.15,00,000/- in favour of the owner-
driver ... unfortunate demise of the insured, a claim under
the aforesaid CPA cover was duly submitted before the opposite party
insurance company. However, despite the lapse
period from 22.03.2024 to 21.03.2025. The policy carried a Compulsory
Personal Accident (CPA) cover of Rs.15,00,000/- in favour of the owner-
driver ... unfortunate demise of the insured, a claim under
the aforesaid CPA cover was duly submitted before the opposite party
insurance company. However, despite the lapse
period from 22.03.2024 to 21.03.2025. The policy carried a Compulsory
Personal Accident (CPA) cover of Rs.15,00,000/- in favour of the owner-
driver ... unfortunate demise of the insured, a claim under
the aforesaid CPA cover was duly submitted before the opposite party
insurance company. However, despite the lapse
period from 22.03.2024 to 21.03.2025. The policy carried a Compulsory
Personal Accident (CPA) cover of Rs.15,00,000/- in favour of the owner-
driver ... unfortunate demise of the insured, a claim under
the aforesaid CPA cover was duly submitted before the opposite party
insurance company. However, despite the lapse
