Engineer, Tube Well Division-IInd, Jagatganj, Varanasi vide order dated 17.02.1989. Said termination order was challenged by claimant-respondent in a writ petition before this ... petitioner is bringing under challenge the final order of termination passed on 17.02.1989. The order of termination challenged on the ground that the same
Court within whose jurisdiction
termination order is issued can have jurisdiction to decide proceedings
relating to validity of termination order. He would also rely upon ... Pondicherry and decision of termination of the employee therein was also
taken at Aurangabad. The Appellant therein challenged termination order
by filing complaint of unfair
itself would not give rise
to an occasion for challenging a termination order which
was otherwise passed only on the ground of criminal
antecedent ... that said order Annexure P-1
cannot be said to be an order of termination of service, rather, it is an order/ a
case
writ petition laying a challenge to the
minority certificate issued to the School.
12. Insofar as challenge to the termination order dated 03.09.2024 is
concerned ... ground to challenge the order of
termination of services, and such termination of services is still
challengeable/can be impugned before the Delhi School Tribunal
order dated 07.07.2008
(Annexure-P-5) which is under challenge in the present writ petition by the
petitioner-Company.
The basic challenge to the order ... right to challenge the order of
termination accrues to the employee from the date of passing of order of
termination. Merely because the criminal proceedings
date of its order in the light of the
fact the petitioner had chosen to challenge the order of termination issued ... challenging the order passed by the Controlling
Authority was dismissed.
3. In the complaint that was filed by the petitioner challenging the
order of termination
termination challenged as casting
stigma on service career - Whether court entitled to lift
the veil to find out real basis of termination order.
Articles ... whether the impugned order of termination
of services of the petitioners can be deemed to be an
innocuous order of termination simpliciter according
expire on 28.2.1981.
His services were terminated on 23.9.1980. The termination order was
challenged on the ground that certain allegations of misconduct had been
made ... service, the order is not considered as punitive while if the
order of termination is founded upon it, the termination is
considered
January 9, 1969. The said order was challenged by filing a suit
on the ground that order of termination having been passed without giving
opportunity ... When the said order was challenged before the High Court
in writ application, the same was allowed and the order of termination was
quashed
came to be terminated vide
order dated 08.05.2015.
7. The respondent No. 1 herein challenged the order of
termination on various grounds in appeal before ... respondent No.1 herein against the
appellants herein challenging the order of termination from
service was maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution.
The appeal
