Corpus is in illegal
custody. In the present case, the
custody/detention of a minor child by
the respondent ... issue of the welfare of the child. The High
Court has disturbed the child's custody based only on the
father's right
examine the legality of the
custody. Habeas corpus proceedings is a
medium through which the custody of the
child is addressed to the discretion ... minor child by a parent or
12
others was illegal and without any
authority of law.
20. In child custody matters, the ordinary
remedy lies
parent
having the custody of the minor have not filed any substantive
proceedings for custody of the child that cannot whittle down ... cannot be said that she has
illegally detained the child. Removing the child from the
custody of the mother when she has been in India
necessarily be given
in the custody of the father, but on the other hand, the custody of
the child may and should remain with ... examine the legality of the custody. Habeas corpus
proceedings is a medium through which the custody of the
child is addressed to the discretion
that the petitioners
had brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved ... that the petitioners had
brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved
that the petitioners
had brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved ... that the petitioners had
brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved
that the petitioners
had brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved ... that the petitioners had
brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved
that the petitioners
had brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved ... that the petitioners had
brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved
that the petitioners
had brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved ... that the petitioners had
brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved
that the petitioners
had brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved ... that the petitioners had
brought the minor child illegally. Thereafter, the child was
kept under the custody of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Aggrieved
