prescribed under Order XXIII
Rule 3 A of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908.
2. The contesting respondent in this appeal is
defendant ... view of the
provisions of Order XXIII Rule 3A of the Code of Civil
Procedure 1908, as the appellants/plaintiffs was inter alia
barred either under Order 23 Rule 1 (4) of the Code
or under Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code ... barred by the provisions of Order II Rule 2 (2)
of the Civil Procedure Code.
12. The provision in Order II Rule
order under proviso
to Rule 3 of Order XXIII Code of Civil Procedure ( CPC ).
9. Pursuant to the Supreme ... orders passed in CS(OS)691/2007 in passing the
impugned order. That suit was barred because of Order XXIII Rule
basis of
filing of a joint application under order 23 Rule 3 CPC and their statements
Suit No. 164/2005 ... approached the defendant for a compromise. A joint
application under order 23 Rule 3 CPC was moved by the plaintiffs
basis of
filing of a joint application under order 23 Rule 3 CPC and their statements
given on oath wherein ... approached the defendant for a compromise. A joint
application under order 23 Rule 3 CPC was moved by the plaintiffs
basis of
filing of a joint application under order 23 Rule 3 CPC and their statements
Suit No. 162/2005 ... approached the defendant for a compromise. A joint
application under order 23 Rule 3 CPC was moved by the plaintiffs
basis of
filing of a joint application under order 23 Rule 3 CPC and their statements
given on oath wherein ... approached the defendant for a compromise. A joint
application under order 23 Rule 3 CPC was moved by the plaintiffs
documents dated 25.9.2006 executed by the defendant nos.1, 3 and 4
and defendant no.2 amount to agreements to sell in the eyes ... subsequently entered into but it was not.
9. In order to question as to whether the two documents dated
Selvakumar
4.Thamizharasan
5.Dhanapal .. Defendants
Civil suit filed under Order IV Rule ... Original Side Rules and under Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure praying for a judgment and decree directing the defendants
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 881 OF 2005
IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 35 OF 2004
Ultratech Cement ... Online Del 54
4 2014(1) MWN (Civil) 13
5 Judgment dt. 30.4.2003 in Arbitration Petition no.107 of 2003 by Bombay High Court
::: Uploaded
