HAVING BEEN HEARD AND
RESERVED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THIS COURT
PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Issue Rule.
2. The petitioner, in this writ ... Court on 10.4.2015 and 30 days time was granted.
The Code of Civil Procedure does not mandate that
copies of the documents annexed
PRONOUNCEMENT OF
ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
This writ petition is directed against the order
dated ... Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 came to be
amended by Act 22/2002 and proviso to Order 6 Rule
17 of the Code
that direction, the application in IA-VI is filed under
Order III Rule 2 of CPC to permit the defendant ... Court of law may order either the plaintiff or the
defendant to remain personally present and order
XXXIIA Rule 3 of CPC
prayed
in I.A.No.4?
4. Whether the objector (Smt.Srilatha
Prakash) has made out a cause under Order
XXI Rule 26 CPC ... falls
within the proviso.
23. Proviso to Sub Rule (1) of Rule 58 of Order XXI
states that no claim is preferred or objection
while considering the
provisions of Order XXII Rule 5 of Code of Civil
Procedure in the case of Kanthiya Singh Santok
Singh ... Section 2(11) and Order 22 Rule 5 of Code
of Civil Procedure in the case of Suresh Kumar Bansal
vs. Krishna Bansal
August, 2016
Equivalent citations: 2016 (4) AKR 5, (2017) 1 ICC 400 (2016) 4 KCCR 3405, (2016) 4 KCCR 3405
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda ... Whether appellant/defendant proves that the
appointment of commissioner is necessary?
(4) What order?
4. The lower Appellate Court below despite
reminding itself, that
FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1(c) OF
THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER
DATED:07.06.2014 PASSED ... filing of this appeal
under Order XLIII Rule I(c) of the Civil Procedure Code.
2. The facts on record would disclose that
this Court under IA No2/2016 under
Order 41 Rule 27 of C.P.C . could not be produced before
the Misc. Court ... ORDER
The appeal is allowed. Consequently;
(1) The order dated 16.4.2016 passed in
Misc. No.843/2012 by the III Addl. City Civil
BANGALORE-560 072.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47
RULE 1 OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER ... aside the order dated 20.08.2009 and had
allowed I.A.No.2 filed by revision petitioner under Order
7 Rule
under Order IX
Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure , to set-aside the
ex-parte order dated 05.03.2009 placing ... defendants the present
application under Order IX Rule 7 of Code of Civil
Procedure filed by the 3rd defendant praying to set-aside
