2000. Within 1 hour 45 minutes from the time the
crime was coi'rm1ittecl. the complaint came into existence.
The police arrived only after
examined as PWs.1 to 18 of which PW.i is the;coi';ip'1--ainsnt« _
and brother of the deceased
close relative of
M'
22
de:<:eased Jayachaxld. A()COI'di1]g to her, 3.5:: f
close relativi: of Jaychand
paid
Rs.5,000/- on two occasions, but he
COi'1&t.i"riliJe
coi;'.t1_se1_' for the petitioner submits
thatioither acelised been acquitted and therefore,
the ground' of parity, the petitioner--accused
iidiscloses that the
deceased was.notf-folly°coi'1scio'us when the statement was
recorded.
The'-counsel
COI
12.
a
16 Od No. $20/2016 |
communication. He further denies that any
Screening Committes was formed as held by the
states that