M/S Crown Consultants (P) Ltd. vs The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. on 31 May, 2011
crystallise the loss due to
deception and secondly, the Certificate of Insurance (CoI) issued by OP 1 to
the complainant (and available with it right
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1110 (3.46 seconds)Bhushan Singh vs Uoi & Ors. on 13 July, 2011
convening of Court
of Inquiry (hereinafter referred to as the "COI") to conduct a
prima facie inquiry into the matter. Besides examining other ... persons the COI examined the prosecutrix and her brother Joy
Dev Sarkar who stated that the prosecutrix was raped by the
petitioners
Puja Dubey vs Union Of India & Ors. on 3 May, 2011
conducted by the Jat Regimental Centre (`JRC‟) Bareilly. The Court of
Inquiry (`COI‟), constituted by the Station Headquarters Cell, in its Report
submitted ... first prayer is that the findings, opinions and
directions of the COI held at Bareilly should be quashed and a fresh COI be
held within
Union Of India & Ors. vs Puja Dubey & Ors. Q on 21 November, 2011
impugning the Report dated 2nd July, 2007 of the Court of Inquiry (COI)
constituted by the Station Headquarters Cell to investigate the cause ... respondent no.1 and to
determine/fix responsibility/negligence if any. The COI concluded that there
was no willful negligence of any specific nature
Rakesh Kumar Sharma vs Uoi on 5 August, 2011
Shri R.K.Sharma, DC
OC Rear HQ
4 Bn BSF
Sub: COI REGARDING DAMAGE OF BREECH BLOCK
OF LMG BREN 303 BUTT ... BODY NO. S-
2950
The COI proceeding on the subject received to this
office without covering letter which is un-acceptable
due to following observations
Vijay Jain vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 25 April, 2011
Circular dated
10th July 2008 issued by the Commissioner of Industries ('COI') fixing
the rates of conversion of industrial plots in Narela Industrial ... Petitioners is that a direction should be issued
to the COI to process the pending applications of the Petitioners for
conversion
Mr.Avadhesh Prakash vs Ministry Of Defence on 25 April, 2011
Army Rules
which lays down that the evidence that surfaces in the CoI is not
admissible in the subsequent proceedings. This, according to him,
further ... Land) (PC) dated 30.9.2010. The name of the
appellant appeared in the CoI for the first time after lapse of after
approx. 20 days
Mr.Sher Singh Rathore vs Ministry Of Defence on 2 June, 2011
other hand, Col. Shukla submits that based on the CoI and
Summery of Evidence, the Army is contemplating GCM proceedings against the
appellant as also ... also stated that disclosure of the opinion and findings of CoI are
likely to impede the process of prosecution. He has given detailed
reasons
Mr.Syed Azimuddin vs Ministry Of Defence on 7 June, 2011
against him for acceptance of illegal gratification
etc. After the completion of CoI, copies of certain documents were provided to
him. However, vide ... copies of preliminary enquiry and related evidence held prior to the CoI;
(b) copies of findings, opinion and directions of CoI."
3. Capt. Senger
Mr.Col Sunil Khosla vs Ministry Of Defence on 1 July, 2011
parties are heard.
2. The matter, in short, is that COI proceedings were conducted against
the appellant for certain acts of omission and commission ... appellant had sought a copy of the findings of the
COI and the opinion of the Court. Besides, he had also sought some other related