submitted another representation to set aside the reconvening order of
COI and seeking a reply to his representation dated September 28, 2015.
Pursuant thereto ... March 21, 2016, the petitioner made representations for setting aside of the
COI as well as for the supply of documents under Rule
been issued on 17th September,
2007 to initiate the Court of Inquiry (COI) against the petitioner on the
allegations made by Sh. Pundir ... dated 30th October, 2007 it
was communicated to the petitioner that the COI would assemble at
Nasirabad near Jaipur on 5th November
been issued on 17th September,
2007 to initiate the Court of Inquiry (COI) against the petitioner on the
allegations made by Sh. Pundir ... dated 30th October, 2007 it
was communicated to the petitioner that the COI would assemble at
Nasirabad near Jaipur on 5th November
17th September, 2007, a Court of Inquiry
(hereinafter referred to as "CoI") was convened to investigate the
complaint against the respondent. Though ... participate in the inquiry, the appellants insisted on proceeding with the
CoI and issued summons to the complainant, his wife and daughter.
8. The appellants
depression with psychotic features. A Court of Inquiry [for
short, "COI"] was ordered against her husband in June ... Page |4
through a duly constituted legal process by directing the COI to
be conducted afresh, thereby quashing the earlier COI.
2.2. According
conducted by the Jat Regimental Centre (`JRC‟) Bareilly. The Court of
Inquiry (`COI‟), constituted by the Station Headquarters Cell, in its Report
submitted ... first prayer is that the findings, opinions and
directions of the COI held at Bareilly should be quashed and a fresh COI be
held within
thereby staying the proceeding of the
fresh Court of Inquiry (COI) initiated against her husband, who is a
retired Brigadier of the Indian Army ... prayer in respect of representation of a legal
counsel during the COI proceedings stands
dismissed.
(d) The respondent authorities are directed not to
invoke
Army Rules
which lays down that the evidence that surfaces in the CoI is not
admissible in the subsequent proceedings. This, according to him,
further ... Land) (PC) dated 30.9.2010. The name of the
appellant appeared in the CoI for the first time after lapse of after
approx. 20 days
this Court of Rule 180 is as follows:
“53. In a CoI participation of a delinquent
officer whose character or military reputation is
likely ... statutory colour and flavour.
It has the binding effect on CoI. The rule
provides for procedural safeguards regard
being had to the fact that
found that the petitioner alleged non-compliance of Army Rule 180. The COI was
returned to the Presiding Officer on 4.1.2005 for rectification of observations ... COI
then reassembled and after giving opportunity to the writ petitioner to cross-examine the
witnesses whom he wished to cross-examine and call witnesses
