Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Respondent-Bank recovered Rs.3,38,055/- from Petitioner no.3 by coersion and force on 14.12.2004. However, Respondent Bank did not return the Title

Kakarla Rosenna And Others vs Thammineni Narasappa And Others on 20 March, 2014 Author: B

years and she  had given her consent for which there was no coersion in any manner so as to  Page

statement, question was put to the complainant whether there is any pressure, coersion, etc. to compromise, to which the complainant answered in negative, hence

establish and prove that the resignation of the petitioner was not by coersion and/or under duress and/or under pressure is erroneous ... failed to establish and/or prove that his resignation was under coersion and/or pressure is on appreciation of evidence, which is neither perverse

support of the writ petition, the appellant has not stated about any coersion/undue influence made by the 3rd respondent or any of the officials

petitioner submits that a document was prepared under threat and coersion indicating the fact that the petitioner wife voluntarily left the matrimonial home and started ... trial court to establish that the document is vitiated under threat and coersion and the said document cannot be relied upon to refuse maintenance

defendant No.1, that he had signed the agreement to sell under coersion is merely a bald plea and it is not proved on record