Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 31 (0.75 seconds)

State vs . Ramphal Page No. 1/21 on 10 August, 2017

stated   that   as   per   the   MLC,   the  prosecutrix was not under intoxication. Coitus is not possible during  deep  sleep.   She   did  not  raise   alarm  when ... quarrel between the accused and PW4.   She stated that during coitus, she did not feel anything.  She stated that since she had not slept
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sarfraz vs State on 3 February, 2017

commission of rape. Apparently, the prosecutrix being a party to the coitus did not come forward to allege commission of rape upon her. Only ... trial. Apparently, she had concealed material facts to deny her consent for coitus. Initially, she did not reveal if any incident of physical relationship
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - S P Garg - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next