that injunction suit was
RCT No. 25/2013 Page 9/14
10
decreed exparte in his favour by the Court. Respondent
specifically pleaded that ... decreed in 1989, though exparte. For the sake of arguments
even if appellant's contention was accepted that suit was
collusive
collusion
between plaintiff and defendant no.1 that suit has been
filed and subsequently decreed. While arguing the Ld.
Counsel relied upon the judgment Shakuntala
separate suit i.e. suit no. 123/2009 against her
which was decreed in his favour on 05.06.2012. Being aggrieved by the same,
she preferred ... High Court in
RFA no.441/2012 is the result of the collusion between the plaintiff and NK,
therefore, the plaintiff cannot take the benefit
since the respondent has not raised any triable issue , his suit be
decreed accordingly. He has denied that Mr. Ramesh Chander is the
present landlord ... Ramesh Chander is not only malafide and
appears to be in collusion with Mr. Ramesh Chander to create false
ground. It is stated that respondent
removed the unauthorized
construction ie the loft and hence, the suit be decreed on this
Uma Vati Vs. Sudershan Kaur
(since deceased through LRs) Page ... thereafter Navneet Singh who was got employed by
petitioner herself , in collusion with petitioner filed the suit for
injunction on 22.11.2004. When the respondent came
similar
jurisdiction i.e. a perception of principles, on which, foreign decrees of divorce
are accorded recognition in America, and a brief acquaintance with ... extraterritorial
effect in New Jersey.(1) American courts
generally abhor the collusive Mexican mail
CS No. 328/14 ARUN SARDANA Vs TINA SARDANA
Page
denies the receipt of the legal notice
specifically. Had there been any collusion between the
respondent herein and plaintiff in the aforesaid suit, the father ... court vide order dated 05.07.2012, considering the facts of
the matter, decreed the suit of the respondent under Order 12
Rule 6 read with Section
fulfill the desire, on 12.08.2010, the respondent no. 1 in
collusion with respondent no. 2 filed a civil suit bearing no. 155/2010 titled ... before the Court. Vide order dated 05.07.2011 the Court decreed the suit
in favour of respondent no. 1 and passed a decree for handing back
denied the
suggestion that she has falsely implicated the accused in collusion with
the complainant.
THE DEFENCE :
12. Statement of accused recorded ... Chander Shekhar,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and the said suit was ultimately decreed in his
favour vide judgment and decree dated 03.02.2001 and against which
East), KKD Courts, Delhi,
vide which, the ld. Trial court has decreed the suit of the
RCA No.16/2013 Page ... defendant. It is also stated that defendant had
hatched a conspiracy in collusion with Sh. Ram Gopal i.e. one
brother of the plaintiff
