unscrupulous elements to file
collusive suits for partition with respect to gaon sabha land
and then enforce the collusive decrees through Court
processes to gain
further contended by the respondents that Deep Chand suffered a collusive decrees in favor of Mange Ram. This question could not be gone into without
have obviously been enacted with a view to ensure that no collusive decrees are awarded against Gaon Sabha in disputes relating to ownership of property
collusion was nto proved, but the lower appellate Court disagreed with the trial Court and held that the decree was collusive and thereupon decreed ... colluding with their friends and enabling the friends to obtain such collusive decrees against the Gaon Sabhas. The Government, therefore, issued a notification
late Gen. Budh Singh and it is argued that hence these decrees are
collusive and not binding on the plaintiff.
7. In my opinion, averring
passed in
Suit No. 220/1998 was obtained by fraud and collusion were
decreed. Suit No. 2201998 was a suit filed by Sarita Khanna
(defendant ... Sarita Khanna
i.e. Suit No. 220/1998 had been decreed. It was in pursuance of
this decree that Sarita Khanna had sought execution
therefore collusion. All these aspects have already been
dealt with by me above by holding that neither there is any collusion ... there was no collusion in getting the agreement to sell signed.
The suit for specific performance was thus rightly decreed
8. In view
only, and this the respondents have pleaded was entirely a collusive affair in order to create a semblance of financial difficulties.
7. Annexure ... attached in execution of their decrees, but the company managed to get the winding up petition moved from a collusive creditor, namely, M/s. Unico
against M/s. Jairam Dass Ramnarain was fraudulent and collusive and not binding on the appellants. they also sought an injection restraining the firm ... suit was decreed by Shri S.D. Tyagi, SJIC, on 9th April, 1960. It was held that the decree was fraudulent and collusive
plea, amongst others, that it was collusive. On April 5, 1966, however, the learned trial court decreed the suit. Against this decree, the Officiai Receiver