Paramound Industries vs C.M. Malliga on 29 June, 1990
interest in, and to immoveable property. This would result in obtaining collusive decrees and dispossessing the persons in possession of immoveable property in their
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 2441 (1.07 seconds)Ramanagouda Siddanagouda Biradar And ... vs Basavantraya Madivalappa Mulimani And ... on 9 November, 2001
inception collusive. If a suit filed at the inception is not collusive, even if the compromise decree passed is collusive in character, then the provisions ... fraud or collusion. A suit may be collusive in its very inception or a decree may be obtained by collusion in a suit which
Akkatai @ Sujata vs Baburao Sattappa Angol on 20 April, 1995
interest in, and to immovable property. This would result in obtaining collusive decrees and dispossessing the persons in possession of immovable property in their
Puttalinganagouda @ Veeranagouda B ... vs The Union Of India on 19 February, 2015
some people
might have executed such registered partition deeds or
obtained collusive decrees of the Court between 20
December 2004 and 8 September
C Chinnappa vs Mr P Chandramouly S/O.Late ... on 22 April, 2014
with his
20
family in the suit schedule property. As the collusive decrees
were affecting his interest, he filed the suit.
5. On the service ... submits that the compromise decrees facilitated
between the defendant Nos.1 to 3 and the defendant No.5 are
collusive. He submits that the sale
Shanoor Begum vs Rukn-Ul-Mulk S. Abdul Wajid (Deceased ... on 24 January, 1997
interest in, and to immoveable property. This would result in obtaining collusive decrees and dispossessing the person in possession of immoveable property in their
Sumitra W/O Bhimanagouda Patil, vs Siddavva W/O Mahadevappa Agadi, on 8 January, 2021
suit properties.
It was also stated that there were some collusive decrees
obtained behind their back, which did not bind them. The
11
plaintiffs sought
B.V. Kuppu Swamy vs Syed Siraj Ahmed And Others on 15 December, 1998
interest in, and to immoveable property. This would result in obtaining collusive decrees and dispossessing the person in possession of immoveable property in their
Mallikarjun And Anr vs Managing Director And Anr on 26 November, 2024
ineligible depriving eligible persons like the
petitioners by acting on collusive decrees in a Hindu joint
family, persons belonging to the Muslim faith have been
Master Harsha Chandrapal vs Smt T S Nagarathnamma on 14 December, 2011
collusive and is not binding on the plaintiffs. Therefore,
the judgments passed in the aforesaid case are collusive
V,
l0
judgments and decrees being ... plaintiffs are entitled
to 1/51" share. These are collusive decrees obtained by
18
fraud and the court below has not been able