Singh. The
land which Baldev Singh and Harjit Singh claimed through
collusive decrees belonged to village Hamad and definitely a
part and parcel ... ancestral property and therefore, Jagir Singh was
not competent to suffer collusive decrees in favour of
defendants Baldev Singh and Harjit Singh. In my opinion
some people might have
executed such registered partition deeds or obtained
collusive decrees of the Court between 20 December 2004
and 8 September
instrument and the courts
shall not grant its imprimatur to such collusive decrees. The
invalidity of the compromise decree which I find in this case
Jarnail Singh and Tara Singh
defendants No.1 and 2 obtained collusive decrees dated 5.1.1974 and
1.12.1976 in respect of the property bearing ... property.
The case set up by the plaintiffs was that these collusive
decrees were not binding on them who have vested right and interest
some people
might have executed such registered partition deeds or
obtained collusive decrees of the Court between 20
December 2004 and 8 September
2011 partition deeds or obtained collusive
decrees of the Court between 20 December 2004 and 8
September 2005 to deprive daughters of their rights
bound to pay the batai-tihai because they have
got suffered various decrees in their favour by which they were
declared to pay the lease ... that defendants
in collusion with Mahant Ravi Puri had obtained the decrees
collusively, which are illegal. It was further averred that the
mutations along with
against the property was decreed on 05.01.1999. There is no
collusion between the defendant and Harris David. The decree in favour of the
defendant ... second defendant in O.S.No.61 of
1999) alleges collusion between D.W.2 and D.W.5, claiming to be a bonafide
purchaser
others against Mai Dhan. In both the cases collusive judgments and decrees have been passed in favour of the defendant-respondents. It has been held ... challenge to those judgments and decrees by alleging that those were the result of collusive decree. Moreover, there is no issue framed. Therefore, the same
debtors. By his plaint he alleged that the said deed was a collusive and fraudulent document. He also alleged that it had not been registered ... valid unless registered.
6. The trial Judge decreed the suit, holding that the said deed was a collusive document, and was not binding on Seth
