Gram Panchayat vs State Of H.P. & Ors on 24 August, 2015
Bench: Rajiv
that, Bakhta Ram had transferred some land to his
daughters through collusive decrees. The petitioners have purchased
land from the land transferred by Bakhta
some people
might have executed such registered partition deeds or
obtained collusive decrees of the Court between 20
December 2004 and 8 September
bound to pay the batai-tihai because they have
got suffered various decrees in their favour by which they were
declared to pay the lease ... that defendants
in collusion with Mahant Ravi Puri had obtained the decrees
collusively, which are illegal. It was further averred that the
mutations along with
time,
defendant No.3 got manipulated certain documents and also
obtained collusive compromise decrees by filing suit in
20 OS. No.1882/2006 ... part of contract , but defendant
No.3 got obtained certain collusive decrees by filing suit
proceedings for which, plaintiff is not party before the
concerned
dismissed on 08.10.2003 and on appeal, it was decreed on 27.03.2004. Though the judgments and decrees of the suit ... third defendant and the defendants 1 and 2 and decrees were obtained by them in collusion, affecting the rights of the bona fide purchaser. Hence
brothers
that is plaintiff and the vendor of the plaintiff Palanivelu in
collusion with the father of the vendor of defendant and
created sale deed ... property. Plaintiffs thereafter filed
collusive suit in O.S. No. 2836 / 1989 against the tenants and
got the collusive suit decreed.
10. After obtaining collusive
attached. As per the
averments of plaint, defendants in a very collusive manner, by
way of filing civil suits, got decree in their favour with ... facts. Since the plaintiff has alleged fraud
and collusion of defendants in getting civil Court decrees and
sale deeds as fraud vitiated by solemn acts
right, Sultan's sons filed a collusive
suit against Sultan, which came to be decreed on 09.03.1991 and
they succeeded in getting mutation
there was any collusion between defendants
No.3 to 5 with any official. In the absence of any evidence of
collusion of defendants ... absence of any
evidence with regard to the collusion, the judgment of the lower
appellate Court decreeing the suit of the plaintiff does not require