centre consisting of Shopping
Centre, Multiplex, along with all its common areas,
staircases, terraces, roof, façade, basements, ingresses and
egresses, parking plant and machinery ... mean built up area plus
walls plus column footprints plus share of common areas and
amenities like corridors, lobbies, staircases, lifts, escalators,
electrical machine rooms
also about the entire Barsati floor and the terrace there having been in his exclusive possession whereon he had put his own lock and therein ... been effected amongst the brothers and consequently all of them had common right of ownership and possession in the entire house including the Barsati floor
determined according to the statute law of India and the English Common Law principle cannot be applied. Even in the decision of the Bombay High ... complainants' properties caused by the demolition of the walls and the terrace can be deemed to be wrongful loss, then the essential element necessary
Raj Singh vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 25 January, 2022
Author: Subramonium Prasad
Jetunben W/O Rafiqbhai Salot vs State Of Gujarat & 3 on 8 February, 2017
Nanu vs State Of Kerala To Be Rep. By on 29 August, 2011
Author: V
Thottiyil Babu vs State Of Kerala on 2 September, 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
Liyakat Ali vs State Nct Of Delhi on 16 March, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2021
Deepak @ Deepak Kumar vs State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) on 25 January, 2022
Author
Aslam Shekh @ Bablu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 July, 2023
Author: Anil
