Additional Sessions Judge (Shahdara) vs State Of A.P on 24 December, 2014
Additional Sessions Judge (Shahdara) vs State Of A.P on 24 December, 2014
FIR No
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 75 (0.92 seconds)Bhanwar Singh & Anr. vs State Of M.P. on 24 July, 2014
accused Bhawar Singh. In the open
terrace/balcony of accused Bhawar Singh, all accused
persons having common object were sitting armed with their
weapons. Accused ... prosecution story, the accused persons
were sitting together in the terrace/balcony (open chhatt) of
accused Bhawar Singh. They were more than 5 in number
Bochu Srinivasulu Munthoudu 6 Others vs State Of Ap., Rep By Pp on 29 May, 2020
unlawful assembly with common object of killing Chodam
Mallikharjuna and P.W.1 - Bochu David. In pursuance of the
common object, accused ... accused, both P.W.1 -
Bochu David and Chodam Mallikharjuna went to terrace of the
hotel, but all the accused attacked them on the terrace
Jai Karan Singh vs State Of M.P. on 23 June, 2022
along with
Bhala came on the spot and in pursuance of the common object to
kill, Lakhan opened his first fire on the members ... injuries. Thereafter Lakhan made second fire on the complainant
party from the terrace of his house which hit the stomach, chest and
armpit of Kallu
Arvind vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 9 November, 2020
house and climbed the terrace of the house of the
complainant alongwith other co-accused persons with common
intention. Custody period is less. On such
Suraj Singh @ Surat Singh vs State Of M.P. on 30 August, 2019
Section 302 / 149 is not
made out. There was no common intention or no common object of
the assembly as can be gathered that ... Baburam.
[19] It is pointed out that Bachan Singh reached his own
terrace and fired gunshots causing death of Pancham, where
admittedly Bachan Singh
Karan Singh vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 November, 1964
deceased and Ramchandra and certain other persons were
sleeping on a Tiwaria (terrace), the assailants entered the
place and Ramhans shot Gabde dead with ... there armed variously and that all had
entered the place with the common intention of committing
the offences.
Ramhans had absconded and so the appellant
Raj Kumar @ Raja vs State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) on 30 July, 2018
that the act constituting the
offence was done in prosecution of the common object of that
assembly, or the act done is such ... assembly
knew to be likely to be committed in prosecution of the common
object of that assembly. However, the prosecution has not discharged
this burden
Manoj Kumar & Anr vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 30 July, 2018
that the act constituting the
offence was done in prosecution of the common object of that
assembly, or the act done is such ... assembly
knew to be likely to be committed in prosecution of the common
object of that assembly. However, the prosecution has not discharged
this burden
Kamal Raj Sharma vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 30 July, 2018
that the act constituting the
offence was done in prosecution of the common object of that
assembly, or the act done is such ... assembly
knew to be likely to be committed in prosecution of the common
object of that assembly. However, the prosecution has not discharged
this burden