compromise entered into with presumptive reversioners.
Further, since at no stage had the plaintiffs pleaded that
the compromise was illegal, the High Court ... going into the validity of the compromise. [31H-32B]
28
(iii) Even if the compromise was illegal the parties to the
compromise were estopped from
said S.M.M.Mohaideen is illegal. The preliminary decree dated
30.08.1969 is based upon an illegal compromise and therefore, the final
decree has also ... Only based upon the said illegal
compromise, a preliminary decree was passed on 30.08.1969 followed by a
final decree on 06.02.1978. Since the preliminary decree
said S.M.M.Mohaideen is illegal. The preliminary decree dated
30.08.1969 is based upon an illegal compromise and therefore, the final
decree has also ... Only based upon the said illegal
compromise, a preliminary decree was passed on 30.08.1969 followed by a
final decree on 06.02.1978. Since the preliminary decree
compromise, has given a seal of approval to an
illegal compromise, maliciously entered into by the respondents with the
sole motive to oust the daughters ... came up with a joint application for getting an illegal
compromise recorded. The appellants were not a party to the said
compromise. The said joint
compromise or refusing to record a compromise, it shall be open to the appellant to contest the decree on the ground that the compromise should ... ground that the decree is based on an invalid and illegal compromise not binding on the plaintiff of the second suit. But after the amendments
Board.
He would point out that there have been cases where
illegal compromise has happened. This line of argument
is taken in the context
compromise or refusing to record a
compromise, it shall be open to the
appellant to contest the decree on the
ground that the compromise should ... ground that the decree is based on an
invalid and illegal compromise not binding
on the plaintiff of the second suit. But
after the amendments
after recording a compromise, it shall be open to the appellant to contest the decree on the ground that the compromise should not have been ... ground that the decree is based on an invalid and illegal compromise not binding on the plaintiff of the second suit. But after the amendments
opinion there is nothing in law which makes such a compromise illegal or invalid, even at the stage at which it was arrived ... where it is still open to the parties to come to a compromise, at any rate before the 87judgment is finally delivered. I have already
signature on any part of the compromise deed or had
agreed to the terms of the compromise. According to the learned counsel, the Plaintiff
never ... total Rs. 3,21,439.84
(Relevant page 14-15 of IA)
3. Illegal filling of two Jalasaya in Suit properties in contempt of the
order
