received it, could not be
deciphered/ identified. In signature the same shown as
'RAJESH' but Constable Rajesh No. 1764/C,1348
acknowledged, however,
that he has received the response on 11.6.07 through a constable who delivered
this to him in person.
Respondent Shri Prabhakar presented ... before us to enquire about the address of the DCP
Traffic / South identifying himself as an RTI applicant and was given the requisite
telephone number
Sharma,
ACP/NE, Shri Surinder Singh, SI and Shri Anil Kumar, Constable/RTI.
2. The appellant through his RTI application dated 20.9.2011 sought
information regarding ... made to trace out
the addresses, the properties could not be traced/identified due to
incorrect/wrong addresses provided. It has also been explained
miscreant/thief of the cameras on the Roof terrace has been
identified? What are the names of the suspects and their addresses?
5. Details ... Phone Number as also the names of Beat Constables
and their Phone numbers.
7. When would the arrest be made? If arrest made, please provide
alleged that there are irregularities in allocation of duty of
the constable in the department and they are asked to do private work instead ... party information. Further, he said the disclosure of the said information and
identifying the source or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security
further submitted that the phone number of the IO
and the Beat Constables provided by the respondent are incorrect. The appellant
further submitted that ... people taking photographs of her house, and these people must have been
identified and investigated by the Police. However, she was informed that the
investigation
T Subbamma vs Department Of Posts on 10 October, 2018
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
(Room No
Kamal Kumar vs Ut Of Andaman & Nicobar on 1 August, 2025
के ीय सूचना
Kamal Kumar vs Ut Of Andaman & Nicobar on 1 August, 2025
के ीय सूचना
Kamal Kumar vs Ut Of Andaman & Nicobar on 1 August, 2025
के ीय सूचना