Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 3249 (1.52 seconds)

Muniyandi vs The State on 20 July, 2010

Sattur, in which P.W.22 and P.W.23, the Constables, identified the accused. Ex.P-28 is the summons sent to the accused ... concerned, he was a Head Constable and P.W.23 was concerned, he was also a Head Constable attached to the Traffic Wing of Rajapalayam
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

- vs - on 28 February, 2020

Constable, handed over the express F.I.R. to the Judicial Magistrate Court on 17.02.2016 at 3.15 a.m. P.W.16, Head Constable, identified ... dress of D1 to the investigating officer. P.W.17, Head Constable, identified the dead body of D2, for postmortem and also handed over

- vs - on 28 February, 2020

Constable, handed over the express F.I.R. to the Judicial Magistrate Court on 17.02.2016 at 3.15 a.m. P.W.16, Head Constable, identified ... dress of D1 to the investigating officer. P.W.17, Head Constable, identified the dead body of D2, for postmortem and also handed over

- vs - on 12 February, 2020

about the missing of jewels, mobile phones of the deceased, and he identified M.Os.4 to 7. P.W.7 is an auto driver ... treated as hostile witness. 13.P.W.11, Head Constable, identified the dead body of the deceased for postmortem, after postmortem handed over the visceral

Periyasamy vs State Rep. By on 18 June, 2018

Court through Thirisangu (P.W.18) Grade– II Constable attached to Irumbulikuritchi Police Station. He conducted an inquest (Ex.P19) on the body ... body for postmortem. f) Thiru.Susilkumar (P.W.19), Grade – II Constable, identified the body of the deceased to Dr.Tamilmani
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next