further submission was also made that the
policy being the policy in the nature of CPM Policy,
it does not cover the 3rd Party claim ... accident admittedly occurred beyond the location
area, the policy being the policy in the nature of
CPM Policy, the appellant is not at all liable
further submission was also made that the
policy being the policy in the nature of CPM Policy,
it does not cover the 3rd Party claim ... accident admittedly occurred beyond the location
area, the policy being the policy in the nature of
CPM Policy, the appellant is not at all liable
policy. Ex.R1 and
Ex.R.2 are the policy issued as Contractor's Plant and
Machinery Insurance Policy. The insurance policy issued ... Plant and Machinery Policy (CPM Policy).
Therefore, under these circumstances, when policy issued
is CPM Policy, third party risk is covered
above discussed, admittedly, the insurance
policy in the present case is Contractor's Plant and
Machinery Policy (CPM Policy). There is no stipulation that ... Contractual Policy is different from
the Statutory Policy. Here the Insurance Policy is not a
Statutory Policy, but it is the Contractual Policy
above discussed, admittedly, the insurance
policy in the present case is Contractor's Plant and
Machinery Policy (CPM Policy). There is no stipulation that ... Contractual Policy is different from
the Statutory Policy. Here the Insurance Policy is not a
Statutory Policy, but it is the Contractual Policy
appellant is that
the policy was a special policy i.e., Contractor's Plant
and Machine (CPM) policy and the liability to third party ... counsel for the
respondents/claimants specifically asserted that though
it is CPM policy, the third party risk is covered and the
7
insurer is liable
Hywa resulting his death.
4. Mr.Khan submits that CPM policy (Contractors Plant and
Machinery) policy was taken in respect of the offending Tata Hywa ... contend that the risk
coverage in respect of CPM policy cannot be extended to cover the risk
provided under the MV Act in respect
conditions as set out in
the relevant Contractors Plant and Machinery Policy (CPM Policy)?
III. Whether the repudiation of claim by the defendant is correct ... within
the purview and scope of the CPM policy?
IV. Whether the claimant in the instant suit proceeding is entitled to the
claim
conditions as set out in the relevant Contractors Plant and
Machinery Policy (CPM Policy)?
3. Whether the repudiation of claim by the defendant is correct ... within the purview and scope of the CPM policy?
4. Whether the claimant in the instant suit proceeding is entitled
to the claim
only on the pretext that the said policy is named as CPM
Policy and not a Motor Vehicle Policy. The respondent no.
3/Insurance company ... insured vide policy No. 030600/44/05/30018
(CPM policy) valid from 15.06.2005 to 14.06.2006 in the name of
respondent no 2 and only third
