faces prosecution is the
raison detre of the legislative insistence on that score.
In this case, appellant is aggrieved because a counsel
engaged ... brother of five sisters, and the
youngest among them, Suman, had secured creditable academic
laurels. She was given in marriage to Dr.Dinesh Kumar Gupta
fields with P.W. 7. A quarrel had arisen on this score between the two and this led to grudge borne by the accused against ... used to buy grocery from P.W. 7's shop on credit but that the former defaulted to pay and when pressed, picked
appellant. She was also cross-examined by the
defence but her creditability remained unimpeached.
P.W.4 also deposed that on hearing ... hospital.
There was no cross-examination by the defence on that score.
Thus, we find the testimonies of the above witnesses are consistent
and have
Mohammad appears to be an independent witness and nothing could be scored out from his cross-examination which could detract this fact. Bald suggestion ... arguments sake, the evidence of Ali Mohammad is excluded from consideration, the credit worthy ocular account furnished by Laxman Prasad PW 1 is sufficient
Rajendra Prasad Etc. Etc vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 9 February, 1979
Equivalent citations
Vikas Yadav vs State Of U.P And Ors. Etc. Etc on 3 October, 2016
State Of Haryana vs Nirmal Singh And Another on 29 September, 1998
Equivalent citations: 1999CRILJ662
Achhar Singh vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 7 May, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIR
Baleshwar Mahto vs The Stste Of Bihar on 13 March, 2013
Author: Aditya Kumar Trivedi
Mahesh Rai vs The State Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 13 May, 2019
Equivalent
