cheque amount. The Accused informed the complainant to
redeposit the cheque. The cheque was again deposited. It was
dishonoured with remarks 'NON CTS ... CTS cheques cannot be presented in CTS.
Bank have been advised to withdraw the non-CTS cheuqes from the
customers. However, NON-CTS cheques remain
cheque amount. The Accused informed the complainant to
redeposit the cheque. The cheque was again deposited. It was
dishonoured with remarks 'NON CTS ... CTS cheques cannot be presented in CTS.
Bank have been advised to withdraw the non-CTS cheuqes from the
customers. However, NON-CTS cheques remain
cheque amount. The Accused informed the complainant to
redeposit the cheque. The cheque was again deposited. It was
dishonoured with remarks 'NON CTS ... CTS cheques cannot be presented in CTS.
Bank have been advised to withdraw the non-CTS cheuqes from the
customers. However, NON-CTS cheques remain
cheque amount. The Accused informed the complainant to
redeposit the cheque. The cheque was again deposited. It was
dishonoured with remarks 'NON CTS ... CTS cheques cannot be presented in CTS.
Bank have been advised to withdraw the non-CTS cheuqes from the
customers. However, NON-CTS cheques remain
cheque amount. The Accused informed the complainant to
redeposit the cheque. The cheque was again deposited. It was
dishonoured with remarks 'NON CTS ... CTS cheques cannot be presented in CTS.
Bank have been advised to withdraw the non-CTS cheuqes from the
customers. However, NON-CTS cheques remain
cheque amount. The Accused informed the complainant to
redeposit the cheque. The cheque was again deposited. It was
dishonoured with remarks 'NON CTS ... CTS cheques cannot be presented in CTS.
Bank have been advised to withdraw the non-CTS cheuqes from the
customers. However, NON-CTS cheques remain
cheque amount. The Accused informed the complainant to
redeposit the cheque. The cheque was again deposited. It was
dishonoured with remarks 'NON CTS ... CTS cheques cannot be presented in CTS.
Bank have been advised to withdraw the non-CTS cheuqes from the
customers. However, NON-CTS cheques remain
contention that the cheque in
question was a non CTS cheque and in view of the
communication dated 18.3.2013 by the Reserve Bank of India
book) and
pointed out that the cheque in question was non-CTS cheque and
validity thereof was up to 31st July and as per Notification
mtrs. for
1239 sq. mtrs. of the land acquired under CTS No. 14 part at Rs.2,35,410/-
adding thereto 30% solatium ... plaintiff No.1 herein has accepted the cheque for the compensation
amount of the suit land under CTS No. 14 part admeasuring 1239 sq. mtrs
