Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 59 (0.71 seconds)

Ito, Rohtak vs Veekay Medicos, Rohtak on 7 November, 2016

supported by any invoices/cash memos issued to various customer/retailers. Assessee is agent of BSNL and carrying out various activities which include sale ... disallowance, holding that there was no principal to agent relationship between assessee and the customers. Now, undoubtedly, the 'commission' in question
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dcit Circle 8 (1), vs Assessee on 12 April, 2016

engaged in undertaking advertising services for its customers/AEs in the capacity of an agent. As part of its business operation, the assessee facilitated placement ... assessee to vendor was recovered from the respective customers or AEs. In the event customer failed to pay any such amount to the advertisement agency
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Acit, New Delhi vs Assessee on 19 July, 2016

agents to the assessee only outside India. These agents were not having business connection in India nor any permanent establishment in India. These agents were ... agents in India, insofar as services were rendered by the agents outside India. Thus, the commission paid to these agents was not chargeable
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next