filed against the
appellant and certain employees of MCD by the respondent-CBI
before the Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi ... High Court in Dharambir
4
Khattar versus Central Bureau of Investigation1and R.C. Sabharwal
versus Central Bureau of Investigation 2. It was observed :
“However, since
equipment whereas what has been
done by BPL is to quote higher customs duty.
32. Insofar as Sterling Cellular is preferred for Delhi
that again ... factually
incorrect. Equally, to state that this respondent quoted a
lower
668
customs duty and thereby got higher marks is incorrect. The
financial
requires,- (a) "law" includes any Ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having in the territory of India the force ... this section, Law includes any ordinance, order, bye-Law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages. This definition of law is given a wide meaning
High Court also issued notice to the Central Bureau
of Investigation (hereinafter called the `CBI').
(G) It was during the pendency ... Parikh v. State of Gujarat &
Anr. , AIR 2006 SC 915; Central Bureau of Investigation v. Ravi
Shankar Srivastava
NDPS Act , being a penal statute, is in contradistinction to the Customs
Act, 1962 and the Central Excise Act, 1944 , whose dominant object ... Possession) Act, 1966 , the Sea Customs Act, 1878,
the Central Excise Act, 1944 , and the Customs Act, 1962 .
5. Shri Puneet Jain supplemented these arguments
referred
to the decision in Central Bureau of Investigation v. Duncans Agro
Industries Ltd. [3] and Nikhil Merchant v. C.B.I. [4] came ... Bench
decision in Central Bureau of Investigation v. Jagjit Singh [12]
wherein the court being moved by the CBI had overturned the order
that his
co-defendants were prostitutes, who had received business
calls from customers through his telephone answering
service, despite which Lauria continued to furnish them ... statement regarding that, which
he had subsequently made when interrogated by the C.B.I.
Another contention to be advanced is that if the action
SUNIL BHARTI MITTAL |.....APPELLANT(S) |
|VERSUS | |
|CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION |.....RESPONDENT(S) |
W I T H
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 35 OF 2015
(arising ... granted.
After sometime, an information was disclosed to the Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) alleging various forms of irregularities committed in
connection with
presented himself before the authorities under the Customs Act, 1962
(for short "the Customs Act ") for customs clearance. He was carrying a
carton ... Kulwant Singh-lnspector Customs
(Complainant and investigating officer)
PW-2 KK Gupta- Superintendent-Customs (A Gazzeted Officer)
PW-3 Ashok Kumar- Inspector, Customs Department (Deposited
must be remembered that the statement
made before the Customs officials is not a
statement recorded under Section 161 of the
Criminal Procedure Code ... Therefore, it is a
material piece of evidence collected by Customs
officials under Section 108 of the Customs Act.
That material incriminates the petitioner
inculpating
