land which was the
subject matter of acquisition and was situated in Cuttack
Cantonment was really Khasmahal land belonging to the
Government and having made ... piece of land for construction of
quarters for their staff posted at Cuttack. In this
connection, the said authorities approached respondent
development of the residential area known as 'Friends
Colony' in Cuttack city. M/s Modern Mechatech Housing Ltd.,
the respondent ... Orissa,
through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Housing and Urban
Development Department, and Cuttack Development Authority
(hereinafter the 'Authority' for short). The property involved
some
controversy, a Bench of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal
was created at Cuttack but its functioning led to litigation
and therein the making ... functioning. However, some grievance persisted in those
favouring creation of the Cuttack Bench and a contempt
petition was filed by an advocate against the Chief
Subsequently, Benches of the Tribunal had been set-up at Jabalpur, Jodhpur, Cuttack, Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Patna, Chandigarh, Guwahati and Hyderabad. 2.The constitutional validity
section 420 of the
Indian Penal Code. On appeal, the Sessions Judge, Cuttack
upheld the judgment and order of the Sub- Divisional
Magistrate and affirmed ... waste holes. In response to the said invitation, twelve
firms including the Cuttack Plumbing Stores of which Nakula
Sahu, respondent was the proprietor submitted their
Mahabir Prasad Santuka & Ors vs Collector, Cuttack & Ors on 11 February, 1987
Equivalent citations ... PETITIONER:
MAHABIR PRASAD SANTUKA & ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
COLLECTOR, CUTTACK & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT11/02/1987
BENCH:
SINGH, K.N. (J)
BENCH:
SINGH
Hadibandhu Das vs District Magistrate, Cuttack & Anr on 2 May, 1968
Equivalent citations: 1969 AIR 43, 1969 SCR (1) 227, AIR 1969 SUPREME COURT ... Vaidyialingam , A.N. Grover
PETITIONER:
HADIBANDHU DAS
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CUTTACK & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
02/05/1968
BENCH:
SHAH, J.C.
BENCH
before the Registrar at the residence of the
Chief of Hindol at Cuttack and was authenticated by him. It
was argued for the appellant that ... invalid on three grounds: (1) that the defendant was not
residing at Cuttack at the time of the execution of Exhibit
B, and consequently
shall come into force in the area comprised Master Plan area of Cuttack, Bidanasi and Choudwar to which the provisions of Orissa Town Planning ... State Government do hereby constitute a Development Authority for the Cuttack Development Area declared as such in the notification of Government of Orissa
villages
8.7.1981 hects. (Dhankanal Distt.)
2. 23.6.1981 142.000 Ostapal Village, SukhindaTehsil
hects. (Cuttack Distt. )
3. 6.7.1981 108.860 Kamarada and padar villages
hects. (Cuttack Distt ... Ostapal and Gurjang villages,
Sukhinda
10.9.1981 hects. Tehsil (Cuttack Distt.)
5. 24.11. 1981 147.693 Ostapal and Gurjang villages,
Sukhinda
hects. Tehsil (Cuttack Distt
