case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the de facto
complainant, who is the Registrar of Companies (ROC), lodged a
complaint stating that ... Basing on the complaint lodged by the de facto complainant, a
case in Crime No.24 of 2022 was registered against the accused
case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the de facto
complainant, who is the Registrar of Companies (ROC), lodged a
complaint stating that ... Basing on the complaint lodged by the de facto complainant, a
case in Crime No.24 of 2022 was registered against the accused
case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the de facto
complainant, who is the Registrar of Companies (ROC), lodged a
complaint stating that ... Basing on the complaint lodged by the de facto complainant, a
case in Crime No.24 of 2022 was registered against the accused
case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the de facto
complainant, who is the Registrar of Companies (ROC), lodged a
complaint stating that ... Basing on the complaint lodged by the de facto complainant, a
case in Crime No.24 of 2022 was registered against the accused
Vamsheedhar Reddy,
learned counsel for respondent No.2-de facto complainant and
Mr. M.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor
appearing for respondent ... petitioner-accused No.1 is the husband of the de facto
complainant. Due to matrimonial disputes, the petitioner-accused No.1
filed
Kondadi Ajay Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the
2nd respondent-de facto complainant and Mrs. S.Madhavi, learned
Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent ... record.
3. The petitioner-accused No.1 is the husband of de facto
complainant. The petitioners-accused Nos.3, 4 and 6 are the mother
prosecution, in brief, is that the petitioners have
induced the de facto complainants and several others to invest
amounts in their Company, thereby collecting approximately ... general public. Basing on the two complaints lodged by the de facto
complainants, cases in Crime Nos.196 and 199 of 2018 were
registered against
gist of the complaint is
that the 2nd respondent-de facto complainant was married to accused
No.1 on 06.10.2017 and it was an arranged ... harassed her physically and mentally demanding
additional dowry. On 26.01.2018, the de facto complainant left to USA.
Within few months, she got pregnant. When
State. There is no representation for
respondent No.2-de facto complainant. Perused the record.
4. The petitioners-accused ... marriage on their demand.
After marriage, accused No.1 and de facto complainant lived together
with petitioners-accused Nos.2 and 3 for one month
State. There is no representation for
respondent No.2-de facto complainant. Perused the record.
4. The petitioners-accused ... marriage on their demand.
After marriage, accused No.1 and de facto complainant lived together
with petitioners-accused Nos.2 and 3 for one month
