Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Mukesh Singh vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 28 February, 2014 Author: Kailash Gambhir Bench

evaluate the evidence produced by the prosecution, independently of the said defect and then decide whether the evidence which the prosecution has produced is creditworthy ... into the hands of the investigating officer if the investigation is designedly defective." The Apex Court in the case of Paras Yadav v. State

State of Punjab , wherein it was categorically held that Investigation being defective in nature :29: cannot be made a basis for acquitting the accused, more ... tantamount to plying into hands of Investigating Officer if investigation is designedly defective. It has already come on record by way of deposition

been observed that : "5. In the case of a defective investigation the Court has to be circumspect in evaluating the evidence. But it would ... into the hands of the investigating officer if the investigation is designedly defective." "The contaminated conduct of officials should not stand

been observed that : "5. In the case of a defective investigation the Court has to be circumspect in evaluating the evidence. But it would ... into the hands of the investigating officer if the investigation is designedly defective." "The contaminated conduct of officials should not stand

Page 13 of 15 Investigating Officer of the case. 21. Consequences of defective investigation have been elaborated in Dhanaj Singh v. State of Punjab ... into the hands of the investigating officer if the investigation is designedly defective. (See Karnel Singh v. State

settled that the defect in the investigation by itself cannot be a ground for acquittal. If primacy is given to such designed or negligent investigations ... into the hands of the investigating officer if the investigation is designedly defective. Other circumstances 32. The post mortem of the deceased was carried

been given to him by the complainant. However, the benefit of defect of investigation does not automatically accrue to the accused. The court, in such ... into the hands of the investigating officer if the investigation is designedly defective." The Apex Court in the case of Paras Yadav v. State

mobile phone claimed by the complainant, that would be a defect in the investigation, benefit of which would not accrue to the appellant. As held ... into the hands of the investigating officer if the investigation is designedly defective." The Apex Court in the case of Paras Yadav v. State

into the hands of the investigating officer if the investigation is designedly defective. (See Karnel Singh vs State of M.P. : 1995CriLJ4173 ). 6. In Paras ... playing into the hands of Investigating Officer if the investigation is designedly defective. In the case on hand, I am of the opinion that