effect that he has not been dismissed for corruption or disloyalty to the State or to payment of the deposit amount. In their very nature
High Court Of Karnataka vs Syed Muneeruddin Mulla on 17 December, 2014
Bench: N.Kumar
visible symbol of the State. The very existence
of the State will be in jeopardy if the Government
established by law is subverted. Hence ... hatred or
contempt or creating disaffection in the sense of
disloyalty to the State, in other words bringing the
law into line with
their conduct, jeopardise the safety and
stability of the State, or disseminate such feelings of disloyalty
as have the tendency to lead to the disruption ... visible symbol of the
State. The very existence of the State would be in jeopardy if
the Government established by law is subverted. And that
therein are seditious and ultimately held that, an extract in the book, stating that the Rowlatt Act was intended "to suppress once ... false, and made by him with the deliberate intention of promoting disloyalty and hatred as also a statement that, that Act, a Government measure,
gave
Sri Gopal Krishna Belur vs Sri B S Yeddiyurappa on 18 October, 2010
Author: J
High Court Of Karnataka vs Syed Mohammed Ibrahim on 17 December, 2014
Bench: N.Kumar
High Court Of Karnataka vs Izher Baig on 17 December, 2014
Bench: N.Kumar , Rathnakala
Sri C Muniraju vs Sri S N Subbareddy on 16 February, 2026
Author: M.G
T.M. Chandrasekhar vs L.R. Shivaramegowda on 27 September, 1991
Equivalent citations: ILR1992KAR444, 1991