District, requesting to quash
the proceedings against them in the said DV Case.
2. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel ... petitioners, the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent/applicant in the DV
Case and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the 1st respondent-State. I
have
respondent herein is the petitioner in the DV
Case. The petitioners herein are the respondents 5 to 8 in the DV Case.
The parties shall ... present DV case was filed by the 2nd
respondent. The law is well settled that in a matrimonial case like the
present case, when only
respondent herein, who is the petitioner in the said DV case, is the wife of
the 1st respondent in the DV case. The petitioners ... respondents 2 & 3 in the said DV case, are the parents-in-law of the said
petitioner in the DV Case, that
Police personnel.
4. The appellant-wife filed a Domestic Violence (DV) Case No. 146/2017 before
the Court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC ... husband used to torture the petitioner, both
mentally and physically. The DV case No. 146/2017 was disposed of by the Court of
JMFC vide
were
not a criminal case, the appellant was required to disclose it. The
technical defence that the case under DV Act was not criminal ... decide
whether it is a criminal case or civil case.
4.4. The concealment of pendency of case under DV Act is a
material fact which
learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kamrup(M) at Guwahati in DV Case No.
156/2023 whereby the petitioner was directed to pay an interim maintenance ... same in the
Page No.# 8/10
proceeding under DV Act (DV Case No. 156/2023) pending before the learned
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kamrup
order dated 10.10.2018 in favour of the petitioner. The DV case being,
MISC Case (DV) No. 03/2018 was finally disposed ... counsel for the respondent, Mr. P.B. Paul submits
that the DV Case No. 03/2018 had been disposed of on 27.02.2024 by the
learned
proforma and no-filing of domestic incident report.
10. Further, this DV case was filed before the trial court
on 20.01.2018 alleging that the marriage ... record of the case it appears that before
filing this DV case on 20.01.2018, the petitioner, earlier
filed another DV Case
fact and documents
placed on record by the respondent in the DV case.
ii. that the Ld. Trial court has passed the impugned
order seizing ... itself of the territorial jurisdiction to
entertain the DV case, despite recording that the
appellant and respondent got married in Noida, have
only lived together
utilised to the fullest
extent by the Courts taking up DV cases (DV Courts).
4. She would contend that the impugned circular with
regard ... precisely what in the facts of her case
would be the most efficacious remedy - and cases of DV
are like snowflakes.
(j) It has been
