Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 474 (1.30 seconds)

A.N.Kumar vs A.Shalini on 6 August, 2025

present criminal revision is filed by the respondent in main DV Case. 2. The respondent herein filed a complaint under the provisions of the Protection ... fifteen days prior to the filing of the complaint in the DV case, thereby casting serious doubts over her identity and credibility. 9. The learned
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

Jeyabalan vs State on 12 February, 2020

said petition dated 18.07.2016 and in the DV case pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Karur, PW1, wife of accused/appellant has not stated ... judgment. 17. Lastly, it is also vital to state that in DV.Case.No.29 of 2016, one Mr.Raja, Advocate, appeared on behalf
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - T Raja - Full Document

Jeyabalan vs State on 12 February, 2020

said petition dated 18.07.2016 and in the DV case pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Karur, PW1, wife of accused/appellant has not stated ... judgment. 17. Lastly, it is also vital to state that in DV.Case.No.29 of 2016, one Mr.Raja, Advocate, appeared on behalf
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - T Raja - Full Document

K. Thiruththaninathan vs /

earlier complaint in DV case No.2 of 2016 was quashed by this court. Therefore, the criminal proceedings as against the petitioners are not maintainable ... complainant suppressed the material facts with regard to the earlier DV Act case in DVC No.2 of 2016 against the petitioners and remained silent
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - V Sivagnanam - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next