respondent herein is the petitioner in the DV
Case. The petitioners herein are the respondents 5 to 8 in the DV Case.
The parties shall ... present DV case was filed by the 2nd
respondent. The law is well settled that in a matrimonial case like the
present case, when only
respondent herein, who is the petitioner in the said DV case, is the wife of
the 1st respondent in the DV case. The petitioners ... respondents 2 & 3 in the said DV case, are the parents-in-law of the said
petitioner in the DV Case, that
were
not a criminal case, the appellant was required to disclose it. The
technical defence that the case under DV Act was not criminal ... decide
whether it is a criminal case or civil case.
4.4. The concealment of pendency of case under DV Act is a
material fact which
arrest [NBWA] against the petitioner in connection with C.R. [DV]
Case no. 665/2019.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that ... said application was registered and numbered as C.R. [DV] Case no. 665/2019
before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dhubri
order dated 10.05.2019 passed by
the Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup in Misc. (DV) Case No. 09 n of 2019 and the order dated
17.07.2019 passed ... order dated 02.03.2019 passed by the Judicial
Magistrate, Kamrup in Misc.(DV) Case No. 09 n of 2019 is absolutely bad in law. Therefore
herein is the first party/ complainant in
C.R. (DV) Case No.1136/2017, filed under section 12 of the Protection of
Women from Domestic ... submitted that the present proceeding of domestic violence,
being CR (DV) Case no. 1136/2017 was not maintainable and was liable to be
quashed
petitioner as he has also to
appear and contest the DV case before the S.D.J.M., Talcher. As it
would be convenient ... both the cases are taken up at one place, so
the DV Case should be transferred to the Court of the SDJM
Cuttack
learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Saidapet, to dispose of the case in DV Case No.63 of 2017 within the statutory
period of sixty days ... learned IX Metropolitan
Magistrate, Saidapet, to dispose of the case in DV Case No.63 of 2017 within the
Page
DV case, are seeking to quash present case
against them in the said DV case by inter alia
contending that as under ... Petitioners to face the trial,
which is unnecessary in the DV Case. Hence,
the continuation of the proceedings in the DV
Case against the Petitioners
stated that on 05.09.2014, defendant no.2 had
filed DV case against him and his father of which he was not aware and
Ravindra Kumar ... further deposed that he received the summons of the DV case
through phone call of police officer on 30.11.2014 as he had no permanent
address
