however
contended that the order passed in DV Case no.15 of 2010 is
in due process whereas order passed in Cr. Misc. is order ... adjusted regarding order for payment of Rs. 5000/- per month
in DV. Case No. 15/2010, till the order is revised in revision
filing the said proceedings of the guardianship case in her
appeal under the DV Act before the learned ASJ, clearly tantamount to gross
abuse ... counsel upto 01.07.2011, when the case was transferred to the
Court of the Principal Judge, Family Court. The case was assigned to the
Court
present case, application was filed
by the appellant/complainant on 15.06.2009. Detailed para wise reply was filed
by the respondents supported by their affidavits. Thereafter ... Thereafter, she was of the opinion that primafacie
case of DV Act was made out against her.
11. Now, shop no. 51, CR Park
proviso of 1 (2) of Section 12 of the DV
Act. In the instant case, as for the present, the parties have
not made ... misread in order to disqualify the registering of
the case under Section 12 of the DV Act. Hence, the prayer
made by the petitioner does
Prosecutrix
was discharged at the time of charge. Motive behind this case is to
grab the property of the parents. The property belonged ... cases i.e. case for
molestation u/s 354 IPC, partition suit, complaint case u/s 156 (3)
Cr.P.C., a case under DV
Noting sheets relating to processing this case at HQ UB
Area and HQ Central Command based on which GOC-in-C
awarded me Severe Displeasure ... information:
"(a) All notings and correspondence of case file No.
0337/UN/PERS KIT STORES/DV2 of HQ Western
Command.
(b) Action taken
issues arising in the case. Additionally, it has been
pointed out that while rendering its opinion in the aforesaid case this
Court had no occasion ... benefits under the DV Act . In fact, grant of maintenance in the
present case would amount to conferment of benefit and protection to the
wrong
under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (DV
Act). The petitioner herein entered appearance before the learned Magistrate,
and resisted ... case may be, an order of any other Court. Rule 6(5) of the rules
framed under the DV Act provides that the orders passed
medical fitness, continued satisfactory performance and clearance
from DV.
4. The petitioner contended that pursuant to the letter dated 22nd
March, 2007 he sent ... withholding the DV
clearance of the petitioner, and therefore a "deemed sealed cover"
procedure stood applied in the case of promotion
earning
earlier. The facts of the case thus are similar to those of the case in
Sanjay Bhardwaj (supra) cited herein above ... entitled to an order of separate residence under DV Act .
While unlike in the case of Kavita Choudhary (supra) respondent has
not been able
