plaintiffs assert that the adoption of the deceptively similar
mark by the defendant no. 1 and also for the domain name of its website
amounts ... mark containing the word 'DHANI'
as also the 'POTLI' device mark . The defendant no. 1 has
adopted a deceptively similar mark
adoption of the mark
FEMICONTIN by the defendant no.2. The plaintiff claims that
the said mark is deceptively similar to the plaintiff‟s CONTIN ... defendants,
restraining them from using the trade mark FEMICONTIN or
any other trade mark deceptively similar to the plaintiff‟s
CONTIN series of trade marks
interim order, restraining the
appellants from using the mark „POWERNYM‟ or any other
mark deceptively similar to the mark of the respondent
„NIMYLE ... Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act can
arise only when the rival mark is deceptively similar to a
registered mark, thereby causing consumer confusion
trade
mark is registered, or where the similarity of such mark with the
registered trade mark and the identity or similarity of the good ... nature of the marks i.e. whether the
marks are word marks or label marks or
composite marks i.e. both words and label works
2022/DHC/005217
'dienogest' under the mark 'UTTERCARE' or any mark deceptively
similar to the mark of the plaintiffs- 'LAYERCARE ... rights in the said mark. The application of this
mark is still pending before the Trade Marks Registry. The said mark has
been developed after
sale
the buses under the trade mark 'VOLVO' or any other mark deceptively
similar to the trade mark of the plaintiffs. Subsequently ... mark 'VOIVO' on a side of the bus. The said mark is deceptively
similar to the mark of the plaintiffs. The defendant
trade
mark/trade name/logo 'SONAE' or any other deceptively-similar mark to
that of the plaintiff 'SONA' or its derivatives ... question of similarity between the two marks, the marks
have to be considered as a whole. The dissection of the mark is generally
not permitted
added the word 'WINGREENS' to its mark,
the said mark is not deceptively similar to the plaintiff's mark, I again ... injunction against the proprietor of the cited
mark, on the ground that the mark is
deceptively similar. It is settled law that a
person
sufficient to
distinguish the two marks or the source of the goods. The two marks,
therefore, are deceptively similar to each other.
39. The learned ... their
product under the mark 'RAMAA', 'RAMAA MUNAKKA' label or
any other mark, which is deceptively-similar to the appellant
Pradesh during the period of 2018 to 31.01.2022, has
adopted a deceptively similar mark, being „DREAM COMFORT', for
the identical goods. The defendant ... product under the mark „DREAM‟ or another trade mark or logo or
device which is identical to or deceptively similar to the plaintiff‟s trade
