permitted to contend that the damage
had occurred due to defective packaging and thereby
absolve itself of liability. It is also to be stated here ... Carrier
cannot be exonerated of liability on the ground that
there was defective packing.
58. As already stated above, the statute does not
absolve
examined goods" theyflrlllwere
packed for transportation';.. If "package
and there are defects in not liable to
pay the that when the
contract ... that it was due to the defective ~
the damage must have been caused: if
there was defective package, that
the benefit of the defendant
number of people who inhale it along with the air, defective or unhealthy packaging may cause damage to all consumers of goods and so also
loss due to pilferage by directly attributable to any defective or improper packing? Can a defective packing of the good, protect the railways against ... very much easier to remove certain things from a package which is defectively packed than from one which is properly packed".
10. The above
numbers of people who
inhale it along with the air; defective or unhealthy
packaging may cause damage to all consumers of
goods and so also
shall supply to the manufacturer the
different varieties of tea and the packaging material, for
manufacture of the product/s. The manufacturer undertakes to
manufacture ... appellant reserves the
right to replace the defective material and/or packaging material
9
in the event it is satisfied that such defects have
numbers of people who inhale it along with the air; defective or unhealthy packaging may cause damage to all consumers of goods and so also
year
2015-16 in two packages. The first package pertains to
377 borewells and the second package pertains to 396
borewells. The last date ... definite conclusion that there are defects in
the bids of all the tenderers in both packages and
therefore they are not qualified. Therefore, the Tender
subsequent packages.
Therefore, the question at this juncture, remains only in
respect of the packages that were inspected and the
alleged defects that were noticed
Plaintiff
further contended that the incident has occurred on account of
the defective assembly of the front wheel by defendant ... policy and it
was a package policy, which did not cover the risk on account
of the mechanical defect in the vehicle, whereby, insured could
