when Form 'J' does not
record any irregularity, tampering, defective packaging or improper storage,
the prosecution cannot subsequently seek to draw adverse presumptions ... dealer with the manufacturing of
the fertilizer or showing knowledge of any defect, liability cannot be extended
to the dealer and only the manufacturer
accident to trains or to fire.
(b) Pilferage from a package or packages forming part of the said consignment properly packed as in (a), when ... consignment of 'biris' was despatched in seven packages and two packages were found broken and there was a shortage of 39 seers
package, covering, receptacle, animal, vehicle, vessel or other conveyance), shall be made under Section 6-A unless the owner of such (essential commodity, package, covering ... essential commodity, package, covering, receptacle, animal, vehicle, vessel or other conveyance shall be invalid merely by reason of any defect or irregularity in the notice
before or after the commencement of this Act, for the transfer of package deal property to any person, has been obtained by him by means ... whether pass before or after the commencement of Act for transfer of Package Deal Property to any person having been obtained by means of fraud
serious flaw in the investigation and this coupled with other defects, suffocates
the prosecution case completely.
15. The Standing Order No. 1/88 dated ... signatures on each sample and further states that seized drugs in the
packages/containers shall be well mixed to make it homogeneous before the
representative
location which was completed in the
year 2007-2008 for three Packages to the satisfaction of the
Engineer-in-charge. In one feeder right ... taken the court stay.
[6]. As per condition of contract, the defect liability period
was of 12 months from the date of commissioning
same vested in the Punjab State under the
provisions of the Package Deal Properties (Disposal) Act, 1976 .
6.3 The defendants categorically stated that they were ... bona fide purchaser for value and without notice regarding any defect in the
title of the suit land. However, the issue pertaining to the jurisdiction
same vested in the Punjab State under the
provisions of the Package Deal Properties (Disposal) Act, 1976 .
6.3 The defendants categorically stated that they were ... bona fide purchaser for value and without notice regarding any defect in the
title of the suit land. However, the issue pertaining to the jurisdiction
competent court, the institution of the suit cannot be rendered defective on
that ground. The said finding has attained finality and no perversity or illegality ... alleged bar of jurisdiction under Section
16 of the Punjab Package Deal Properties (Disposal) Act, 1976 is equally
devoid of merit. It is well settled
aside
this order by alleging that as the land, in dispute, is package deal
property, the Chief Settlement Commissioner has no jurisdiction to
pass ... land, in dispute, by holding that as the
land, in dispute, is package deal property, authorities under the 1954
Act, have no jurisdiction to deal
