Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2965 (1.32 seconds)

M/S Vrindavan Autos vs Naresh Kumar Singla on 7 May, 2015

part of the said scooter, assuring the complainant that scooter would give the trouble free service henceforward. The manufacturing defect in the scooter ... cannot be manufacturing defect. No expert evidence was led by the complainant to prove the manufacturing defect in the scooter. We further rely upon
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Lml Limited & Anr. vs Ram Gopal Sharma on 15 December, 2014

denied that the scooter became defective again and again. There is no manufacturing defect in the 6 scooter. The periodic servicing and adjustments ... manufacturing defect lies on complainant. No expert evidence produced to prove manufacturing defect in vehicle. Alleged defects cannot be termed as manufacturing defect. Vehicle repeatedly
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Durga Dutt Saini vs Gautam Auto on 13 July, 2007

kept the scooter for many days but failed to rectify the same. It is alleged that the scooter developed a number of defects as detailed ... good.   10.                                     The vehicle may not suffer from manufacturing defect but defect is defect may be of any nature. The word compensation in the context
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Go Green Bikes Private Limited vs Anita Sood on 16 December, 2025

from several defects including uncontrolled automatic running, defective main lock, brake wire issues and ultimately motor failure in December 2023, rendering the scooter unusable. Despite ... complainant, was having manufacturing 3 defects and the failure of the opposite parties to repair or replace the defective scooter amounted to deficiency in service
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next