Mark-F where the bus had hit the scooter
and spot Mark-G till where the scooter was dragged by the bus.
rt
Sarup ... report in respect of both the bus and scooter,
categorically stated that there was no mechanical defect in either of
the two vehicles
that the Scooter in issue was being driven by him, however, his
stand was that he was not driving the aforesaid Scooter in a rash ... categorically
stated that there was no mechanical defect either in the Scooter or in the
rt
truck. Besides this, the Investigating Officer, who entered
Scooter were damaged due to accident and
that the car was damaged due to the accident but there was
no defect in the car which ... that
they were making false statements and as per the site plan,
Scooter was being driven on the extreme side of the road
these
circumstances, accused could have avoided the accident by
sewering his scooter to the right or by stopping it as a
prudent driver. It further ... mechanic, learned Appellate Court held that
there was no mechanical defect in the vehicle and it appeared
that there was no effort on the part
over-taking other bus and in this
process it hit their scooter. He deposed that the accident was a
result of rashness and fault ... first bus,
he brought the scooter towards katcha portion of the road but
despite this, the bus hit the scooter. He categorically deposed
that
Rajinder Pal vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 11 January, 2017
Author: Ajay Mohan Goel
Shri Prem Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 31 March, 2017
Author: Ajay Mohan
