Asst. Cit, Circle-2, Pune vs Shri Rajendra Sitaram Goel, Pune on 9 January, 2017
Asst. Cit, Circle-2, Pune vs Shri Rajendra Sitaram Goel, Pune on 9 January, 2017
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 8064 (1.31 seconds)Acit, Ltu-2,, Chennai vs Ashok Leyland Limited, Chennai on 7 July, 2025
paid for all assets and liabilities except for unbilled
revenue.
ii. Deferred consideration for unbilled revenue accrued up to the
Effective Date payable by Buyer ... therefore noted to have explained
the reason for incorporating a deferred consideration component, apart
from the lumpsum consideration of Rs.93 crores
Ashok Leyland Limited,,Chennai vs Acit,, Chennai on 7 July, 2025
paid for all assets and liabilities except for unbilled
revenue.
ii. Deferred consideration for unbilled revenue accrued up to the
Effective Date payable by Buyer ... therefore noted to have explained
the reason for incorporating a deferred consideration component, apart
from the lumpsum consideration of Rs.93 crores
Huntsman Investments (Netherlands), ... vs The Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 31 July, 2024
dated
October 2020, sales consideration contains 2 components:
1. Closing date consideration; and
2. Total deferred consideration (subject to clause ... also correctly offered full value of sales consideration i.e., entire
sales consideration, excluding the 'deferred (contingent) consideration' since the
conditions were
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... vs M/S. Bhoruka Aluminium Limited, Mysuru on 16 August, 2022
observed that the agreement dated 25th January,
2006 also provided for deferred consideration which was capped at Rs.20
crores, which had to be paid ... respondent-assessee as deferred consideration. The
consideration of Rs.20 crores is not an assured consideration to be
received by the Shete family
Indira R. Shete, Mumbai vs Department Of Income Tax on 3 July, 2012
agreement of sale, the
consideration for transfer of shares is the aggregate of the initial
consideration and the deferred consideration being capped ... whether the entire consideration arising out of such transfer can be
taxed for the year under consideration or only that consideration which has
been received
Mahesh Gordhandas Garodia, Mumbai vs Dcit 22(1), Mumbai on 12 July, 2018
consideration of Rs. 2.70 crore was to be
received immediately and deferred consideration of Rs. 20 crore was to
be received over a period ... respondent-assessee as deferred consideration. The
consideration of Rs.20 crores is not an assured consideration to be
received by the Shete family
Dcit ( Osd) 2(3), Mumbai vs Safari Mercantile P.Ltd, Mumbai on 7 October, 2020
that as there is no certainty of
receiving any amount as deferred consideration, the bringing to tax the
maximum amount of Rs. 20 crores provided ... respondent-assessee as deferred consideration.
The consideration of Rs.20 crores is not an assured consideration to be received by
the Shete family
Sh. Amar Singh, Jagadhari vs Ito, Yamunanagar on 26 February, 2018
Sh. Amar Singh, Jagadhari vs Ito, Yamunanagar on 26 February, 2018
IN THE INCOME TAX
Sh. Jai Ram, Jagadhari vs Ito, Yamunanagar on 26 February, 2018
Sh. Jai Ram, Jagadhari vs Ito, Yamunanagar on 26 February, 2018
IN THE INCOME TAX