into play and the complainant cannot be said to be a consumer as defined in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 . In our opinion ... owns a commercial property, such a person will not be a consumer as defined in the Act since in such a case, it cannot
into play and the complainant cannot be said to be a consumer as defined in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 . In our opinion ... owns a commercial property, such a person will not be a consumer as defined in the Act since in such a case, it cannot
purpose, he is not their
consumer as he does not fall under the definition of 'consumer' as
defined ... purpose, he is not their
consumer as he does not fall under the definition of 'consumer' as
defined
number of residential properties, he cannot stated to be a consumer as defined in Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act. Reliance ... cannot be allowed to contend that the complainant is not a consumer as defined in the Consumer Protection Act . However, even if I take into
with the dealer does not make the said prospective buyer a consumer as defined under the C.P. Act . He also submitted referring ... been pleased to hold that the complainant was not a consumer as defined under section
society can file a consumer complaint on behalf of some aggrieved consumer but it cannot be equated with a consumer. There is a clear distinction ... complainant and a consumer. Complainant is a person who files a complaint whereas consumer is the person as defined under Section
question emerges whether the appellant
firm is a consumer. The word 'consumer' has been defined under
Section ... services contracted
or undertaken between the seller and the 'consumer' defined under the
Act. It is seen that the appellants admittedly entered their
estate, as such, he would not fall within the definition of consumer, as defined under Section ... complainant, thus, falls within the definition of a 'consumer', as defined under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act. Such an objection, taken
Abha Arora vs Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. on 1 April, 2016
Daily Order
STATE CONSUMER
with regard to housing/ construction, did not fall within the ambit of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short 1986 Act). It is also asserted that ... such, the complainants would not fall within definition of a consumer, as defined under Section 2 (1) (d) of 1986 Act. It is further stated
