Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

B.K. Kapur vs P.D. Gupta on 15 March, 1996 Equivalent citations: 1996IIAD(DELHI

father had constructed a building and was in occupation of _ it. Permission for demolition of the buitding was s obtained : by the 2" respondent

very old and it requires demolition and reconstruction, for which the respondent-landlord has also obtained building permission from the Nagapattinam Municipality. The respondent-landlord ... There is no dispute that the respondent-landlord had obtained requisite permission for demolition of the demised premises and reconstruction. In his evidence

Flat Owners Association in favour of the defendants 1 to 8 for demolition and reconstruction of block 119 on the basis of illegal patta granted ... injunction restraining the 10th defendants from according approval of any planning permission for demolition and reconstruction of building adjacent to the site of the Block

Flat Owners Association in favour of the defendants 1 to 8 for demolition and reconstruction of Block 119 on the basis of illegal patta granted ... injunction restraining the 10th defendant from according approval of any planning permission for demolition and reconstruction of building adjacent to the site of the Block

revision petitioner applied to the Corporation of Chennai, for demolition of the tenanted premises and permission was granted on 20.03.2008 and the demolition work ... favour of the revision petitioner and the revision petitioner also obtained permission for demolition of the building on 20.03.2008, and also completed demolition work

dismissal of the I.A., the CMDA and Corporation had accorded permission for demolition of the staircase, veranda and for obliteration of the common passage

very categorically provides the requirement of demolition under which it is provided as to in what manner demolition can be done and as to what ... respondent no.7 will consider the same and grant the permission if demolition is made as per sub-rule 6 of Rule 89 of Rules

repair and they would lose their livelihood and business due to demolition of the said property. 5. It is also stated that the 2nd respondent ... need to evict the petitioner and other tenants till grant of permission for demolition; and the petitioner should be permitted to vacate voluntarily giving

ordered eviction on the ground of demolition and reconstruction, against which the revision petitioner preferred an appeal ... Further, there is no document to show that he had obtained permission for demolition and reconstruction. Hence, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner prayed