Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 9105 (5.00 seconds)

Ashok Kumar vs M/O Home Affairs on 2 August, 2016

been allowed to continue to be on deputation until completion of their deputation tenure, and their deputation is squarely covered under Para ... continued on deputation, there was no reason for non-payment of deputation allowance. So on the basis of statutory rules as well as the policy
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak Kumar vs M/O Home Affairs on 2 August, 2016

been allowed to continue to be on deputation until completion of their deputation tenure, and their deputation is squarely covered under Para ... continued on deputation, there was no reason for non-payment of deputation allowance. So on the basis of statutory rules as well as the policy
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajeev Ranjan vs Uoi & Others Through on 29 January, 2015

fifth year, the official concerned will continue to be allowed deputation (duty) allowance, if he/she has opted to draw deputation (duty) allowance. 8.4 There ... opts. No extension in the period of deputation shall be allowed to him after completing the sanctioned period of deputation. (b) If he draws
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 16 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Vijay Kumar Verma vs Union Of India on 22 February, 2010

parent department. Eligibility might be there in some cases for drawing deputation allowance. Rest of the allowances is as admissible to Group `A officers ... rejoined in his promotional post. Since Rule 4 prescribed for deputation allowance to an officer situated like him, he might have drawn the same
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next